![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Is it better to do things that are primitive and simple, but effective, or very very complex on many levels, but not as effective as the alternative.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
could we have an example?
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
When in doubt, KISS.
__________________
'NEVERMORE!!'
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Provided that the only two variables are simplicity vs. complexity and effective vs. less effective, the simpler & more effective method is preferable. One of the main reasons to increase complexity is to also increase effectiveness. Even then, we frequently need to ensure that the increase in effectiveness justifies the increase in complexity. However, there may be other factors ... like additional consequences. For example, when it comes to conflict resolution, violence is primitive and effective. Mediation is more complex and a lot less effective (in the short term). However, violence has a number of unfortunate consequences (like retaliation) which are not associated with mediation.
__________________
"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." - Hanlon's Razor |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |