![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
|
||||
|
||||
|
Greetings,
The key word above is "observable" or that which can be perceived by the conceptual mind. best, swampy
__________________
every breath is love alive |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
ok so this got into the Ajax chat: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideal_triangle
but we need a real example of one that needs to be a black hole with negative mass for that... also me and poly debated if blackhole singularites were, and he said the math becomes reality at that point and I retorted that we can't know that as it's behind the event horizon. so if we spin a black hole fast enough apparently we can get the horizon out (i assume this happens durring formation) and observe the naked singularity to see if it's truly infinitesimally thin/small or if it is the planck length in diamter. I still hold that no real life physical examples of infinity exist. |
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
|
At the point in which reality ends, it will never have existed.
best, swampy
__________________
every breath is love alive |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
And we then have infinitely nothing? I dont think that would work.
Last edited by jasonwill2; 04-29-2012 at 11:07 AM.. |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rearranging elements = permutation. For any finite set A with a finite number of elements n, the cardinality of the set of all permutations of A, denoted Sym(A), is simply n!. The factorial of any finite number will also be finite.
__________________
This is the way the world ends Not with a bang but a whimper "mors laborum ac miseriarum quies est" -Cicero "non metuit mortem, qui scit contemnere vitam" -Dionysius Cato |
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
When did time become a "physical construct"?
__________________
This is the way the world ends Not with a bang but a whimper "mors laborum ac miseriarum quies est" -Cicero "non metuit mortem, qui scit contemnere vitam" -Dionysius Cato |
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
ever since it was part of of the fabric of reality?
|
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
Time is not a force or a substance.
It is only a quotient on a chalkboard. As time has been mentioned.... I heard somewhere, mass approaches infinity as the speed of light is obtained. Anyone got any 'real numbers' for that?
__________________
First you are told.... 'this is this...and that is that'. Then someone else will come along and say...'No it ain't'. I do BELIEVE as I post! |
|
#39
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
best, swampy
__________________
every breath is love alive |
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And I was hoping for that influence from Einstein's handiwork. His equation implies an increase in mass as the speed of light is approached. So I've heard.
__________________
First you are told.... 'this is this...and that is that'. Then someone else will come along and say...'No it ain't'. I do BELIEVE as I post! |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |