The Obvious Superiority Of RF To Sex (sex, divine)

[Sunstone]

Like many people, I believe the Religious Forums are not only superior to sex, but obviously superior to sex.

For instance: Sex is messy and frequently requires that one launder the sheets, while participating in RF certainly does not require one to do the laundry, and can actually be a way of avoiding doing the laundry.

Moreover, since doing the laundry sometimes pollutes rivers and streams with run off detergent, thus degrading the environment, it is furthermore obvious that sex leads to environmental degradation while participating in RF does not and instead merely creates happiness.

Again, kleenex is sometimes required for sex, but never for participating in RF. But kleenex is made of trees, many of which come from national forests. Denuding national forests of their trees just to have sex results in their no longer being attractive to tourists. When they no longer become attractive to tourists, the tourist businesses that cater to tourists go broke, hurting the economy. But RF plainly does not hurt the economy. Hence, another superiority of RF to sex.

So, is RF obviously superior to sex? What do you think?

Do you agree I have a point here, or are you one of those silly people who harbors a sentimental attachment to your significant other that clouds your better judgement about these things?

Can you think of any other reasons participating in RF is obviously superior to sex? Or vicea versa (sure to be debated, though)?

[MaddLlama]

At the risk of being pummeled, I would have to say that there are some areas where it is clearly not superior to sex.

Firstly, it's not more fun than sex. Yes, RF is full of fun people and mind bending discussion, but as far as I'm concerned, a roll in the hay is so much better.

Second, sex burns calories. I don't know how many people here eat when they're bored or at the computer, but regardless, if visit RF more than 3 times per day, if you took one of those times visiting the site, and had sex instead, you are supporting a healthy lifestyle.

And, to keep people from wasting paper for tissues, there are two ways - first, use a towel instead. Everyone should have thier own personal monogrammed "after sex towel", I say. Keep several, and don't wash just one every day. Second, watse the paper anyway, because if you want more trees, we have to waste more paper so they'll plant more trees. =)

And, RF does hurt the economy. Why, in the space of the time I used to write this post, I could have gone to amazon and bought another book, which is clearly better for the economy than...not shopping.

Of course, given my line of work I could be biased.

[lunamoth]

Well, I think that at times Kleenex are needed during and after RF participiation, depending upon the degree of silliness, which can cause me to collapse in tears and in need of not just kleenex but sometimes towels too, which can add to the laundry problem.

On the other hand, RF viewing can actually interfere with sex, which not only saves on the sheets and laundry, but can also save on kleenex again due to extreme silliness sometimes involved. So, yes RF is better than sex because you can reduce your laundry as well as put off doing the laundry you must do. But, the kleenex thing is a wash.

lunamoth

[Sunstone]

Have I mentioned government funded scientific studies very strongly support the notion that RF transmits far fewer STDs than does sex? Yet, another obvious superiority of RF to sex.

Moreover, RF encorages people to become at least minimally competent in the use of a computer: Something sex is not known to do.

[d.]

Originally Posted by Sunstone

Again, kleenex is sometimes required for sex, but never for participating in RF. But kleenex is made of trees, many of which come from national forests.

you could always keep baby trees in the corner of your bedroom to save kleenex. or recycle your yule tree!

[lunamoth]

Originally Posted by Sunstone

Have I mentioned government funded scientific studies very strongly support the notion that RF transmits far fewer STDs than does sex? Yet, another obvious superiority of RF to sex.

Moreover, RF encorages people to become at least minimally competent in the use of a computer: Something sex is not known to do.

You mean you can't get STDs from a keyboard? I've been mislead...

[Sunstone]

Originally Posted by lunamoth

You mean you can't get STDs from a keyboard? I've been mislead...

Good news! You don't have to wear latex gloves while posting anymore, Luna! I took mine off last week after reading of the studies.

Originally Posted by Divine

you could always keep baby trees in the corner of your bedroom to save kleenex. or recycle your yule tree!

Is it customary in Sweden to...er...wipe with fur trees? If so, I want to know about it: That sounds like a valuable environmentally friendly custom that should be imported to Colorado at once!