Biased Rhetorical Statement Worded in a Misleading and Exaggerated Manner!!!

[Me Myself]

The argument I am making has been made clear for countless pages but you still ignore it.

*does not quote the so called irrefutable argument*

[Songbird]

A bunch of words strung together that imitate real sentences, but not enough to provoke me to read them.

[dyanaprajna2011]

Rebuttal claiming that if you had read said post, you would fully understand my otherwise nonsensical and illogical argument. Goes into tirade about how non-believers never listen to anything be said from the otherside, even though their comments show a clear comprehension of what was stated. Explains that [insert deity here] is all-powerful, and can change the rules if he/she/it/they so desire.

[Meow Mix]

Long delayed exclamation of victory due to a lack of opponents!

[JMorris]

what do words mean?

[Drolefille]

Originally Posted by Meow Mix

Long delayed exclamation of victory due to a lack of opponents!

Query regarding logical fallacy

[Me Myself]

Provides a lot of outdated sources that come from an article of someone who has no academic degree or true knowledge of the subject at hand.

When you confront how unreliable the sources are to even a very quick search, you are dismissed because you checked "too quickly" and are thus untrustable to have been checking correctly, even though no rebate of your debunks is had and the person itself didn´t EVEN made the quick search you did for said sources.

[Drolefille]

Originally Posted by Me Myself

Provides a lot of outdated sources that come from an article of someone who has no academic degree or true knowledge of the subject at hand.

When you confront how unreliable the sources are to even a very quick search, you are dismissed because you checked "too quickly" and are thus untrustable to have been checking correctly, even though no rebate of your debunks is had and the person itself didn´t EVEN made the quick search you did for said sources.

Attempt at rational response

[9Westy9]

Originally Posted by Me Myself

Provides a lot of outdated sources that come from an article of someone who has no academic degree or true knowledge of the subject at hand.

When you confront how unreliable the sources are to even a very quick search, you are dismissed because you checked "too quickly" and are thus untrustable to have been checking correctly, even though no rebate of your debunks is had and the person itself didn´t EVEN made the quick search you did for said sources.

Maybe this should be posted in a certain other thread

[Me Myself]

Originally Posted by 9Westy9

Maybe this should be posted in a certain other thread

*gives you a Biased Rhetorical Statement Worded in a Misleading and Exaggerated Manner that completely ignores everything you just said while putting on a dozen of controversial new subjects of which the main discussion would be what do they even have to do with the OP anyways*