My daughter's teacher is getting married...

[DallasApple]

My children also understand, that the genitals are not a clean place to put their mouths, and that they should properly wash their hands after using the toilet. This will always help to stop the spread of sickness and disease.

Do your children understand that their entire bodies (including their mouths) once traveled through a "genital"?..(specifically their mothers vagina)..

Love

Dallas

[Father Heathen]

Originally Posted by Mister_T

***MOD POST***

Let's get back on topic please.

Okay. My opinion is that these two women getting married is a reality that children shouldn't be sheltered from regardless if their parents think it is a "sin" or not. Love it or loathe it, it's a fact that's going to happen. Why should life be hidden from the kids? They'll will have to discover and come to terms with the world eventually. Should the school cafeteria stop serving meat dishes just because someone might be a vegetarian who thinks eating meat is wrong? Should they racially segregate their classrooms because some kid's parents might be racist?

[UltraViolet]

Originally Posted by codebar

Righteousness does not tolerate complacent, ignorant and cowardly individuals. When that individual claims the status of a man, it is even more revolting. By your action, non-action, deeds, and misdeeds you are the expression of your true religion.

As for this idea that there should be no moral rules in relationship to sexuality and sexual activity, I will remind you that sexually transmitted disease is not a figment of my imagination. I have witnessed the devestation that these backward lifestyles have caused to those who thought they were immune to the outcome of their unwholesome behavior.

Irresposible behavior causes disease,
not "unwholesome behavior".
(whatever that means)

Any committed pairing/grouping of partners
can be tested for disease FIRST...
and then remain honorable/honest to their lover set.

If they want to engage in sex beyond the comforts of their present lover(s),
then they are free to move on.

Testing for disease at that point would then be wise once again.

Even irresponsible heterosexuals pass on diseases.
So do blood transfusions.

In fact MANY things pass on diseases.
Are we then to label ALL of these things
"unwholesome behavior"?

[gnomon]

Originally Posted by Mister_T

***MOD POST***

Let's get back on topic please.

Yes.

The topic is bravo to a homosexual acting just as if society would expect any decent human being to act.

As opposed to deleting posts that contain no vulgarities yet willfully letting people generalize homosexuality as less than human on this forum.

Bravo to ya'll.

[DallasApple]

Originally Posted by UltraViolet

Irresposible behavior causes disease,
not "unwholesome behavior".
(whatever that means)

Any committed pairing/grouping of partners
can be tested for disease FIRST...
and then remain honorable/honest to their lover set.

If they want to engage in sex beyond the comforts of their present lover(s),
then they are free to move on.

Testing for disease at that point would then be wise once again.

Even irresponsible heterosexuals pass on diseases.
So do blood transfusions.

In fact MANY things pass on diseases.
Are we then to label ALL of these things
"unwholesome behavior"?

By far..more communicable diseases are transferred through our "unclean" mouths..noses..and hands...

Example???..My sister when she was younger worked in a day care center with innocent virgin children...And she had a constant strep infection from the childrens dirty snot and filthy saliva..She was told by her doctor..That she either had to quit..or have a tonsilectomy..She quit..And the disease that her body had been racked with ceased...The doctor confirmed her illness was not caused by unclean genitals..

Love

Dallas

[The Voice of Reason]

Originally Posted by gnomon

As opposed to deleting posts that contain no vulgarities yet willfully letting people generalize homosexuality as less than human on this forum.

Trying to be sure that I understand this, gnomon.

Are you saying that you feel that the mods should not delete posts that point out the bigotry while allowing the posts that make absurd attacks on homosexuality to remain on the board? Or are you applauding the mods for doing so?

[gnomon]

Originally Posted by The Voice of Reason

Trying to be sure that I understand this, gnomon.

Are you saying that you feel that the mods should not delete posts that point out the bigotry while allowing the posts that make absurd attacks on homosexuality to remain on the board? Or are you applauding the mods for doing so?

I might be just a wee bit irritated.

It's not the first, it's not even the second time.....

But I must applaud them. I do not raise a stink with the admins over intellectually draining posts offered up by the bigoted and ignorant believers on this forum who continually denigrate homosexuals as human beings because frankly....

I think I can deal with them. But I'm getting a wee bit irritated when my posts that might contain a slightly risque word disappears. If we eliminated posts for their intellectual offense over half of them would disappear.

ARGbargle! bahaahaldldjklal;ljk!

[The Voice of Reason]

That's what I thought you meant.

I have no problem with the mods removing my posts (in part or in whole). I would, however, like to see them remove whatever post (or part of a post) that provoked the response. Or they could simply leave the entire exchange intact.

I see that as only fair.