Intelligently Designed Life on Mars? (Earth, evolution, attend, God)

[LISA63]

Originally Posted by painted wolf

Apparently they have found more evidence for a forzen 'sea' of permafrost ice underthe dirt of the Equatorial regions of Mars. More frozen water means better chance for life.

Do you equate water with posibility for life to come into existence?
What should we think about how polymerization works?
How about the law of mass action?
LeChateliers principle?
To assume that life is posible just because of the presence of water must deny these scientific absolutes. do you deny them?
To acheive a better chance of life you would also need to prove that the above scientific observations don't apply on mars since the chance that life resulted as a natural action within water is 0%

[LISA63]

Originally Posted by The Voice of Reason

Do you have a point here? Do you not realize that the conditions on planets are not static, but that they change over time?

Perhaps you should spend less time rolling on the floor, and more time reading - preferably something in the area of real science, not the pseudoscience that someone is selling you to spoonfeed your willful disregard for reality. TVOR

Do you believe that the rules of polymerization, the law of mass action, LeChateliers principle and the emirically tested and observed folding problem are pseudoscience?

The only thing I need to realize is that these rules of chemistry exist on mars as well as here and life cannot result from the existence of water or all the base chemicals in the universe.

Question; is it true what KBC said in the other thread about how agnostics are supposed to form a belief only on empirical evidence? I would think that if that is true you are willfully disregarding your own faith by arguing for a belief that has no empirical proof for its existence!

[painted wolf]

what rules of plymerization? Polymerization is simply the formation of large (polymer) molicules out of small (monomer) compounds. There are many types of polymerization and they happin all the time both naturally and artifically. For instance Emulsion.

the law of mass action and the LeChateliers priniciple simply state that equilibrium will be saught out in any system. Heat goes out of a hot object and into a cold one.
This naturally gets more complex depending on if you are an open system (nature) or a closed system (lab)

Neither of these are against the formation of life. You seem to simply be throwing around scientific ideas that sound good to you. Do you really understand the processes that you are useing as proof or are you just going by what someone elce told you?

wa:do