![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#261
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Specified complexity was first coined by Demski in ‘The Design inference’- a book specifically mentioned in the Wedge strategy. You want to tie your bets to this crowd? Quote:
__________________
”While one can make a belief sufficiently vague and ephemeral and supernatural to place it beyond scrutiny and contestation, one rarely ever succeeds in placing the barrier of vagueness to stifle it being a pretext for the unjustifiable.“ – Precepts, First book of Zacarianism |
|
#262
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#263
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#264
|
|||
|
|||
|
Please specify which concept of chaos you are using.
__________________
”While one can make a belief sufficiently vague and ephemeral and supernatural to place it beyond scrutiny and contestation, one rarely ever succeeds in placing the barrier of vagueness to stifle it being a pretext for the unjustifiable.“ – Precepts, First book of Zacarianism |
|
#265
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
This is a hard task so let see so far the contributions that we have are: “The force that is dominant here, gravity, is really the only one that counts. In that respect it is a non-chaotic gravitational system”(TMH) so we have here that the planets and the stars are at such distance from each other that implosion of the big bang does not occur, could this be the product of chance? So what about a non chaotic, chaotic universe? Not that won’t work, what a pity. Your contribution is: Nobody said the "system" was chaotic. What happens in the universe is chaotic, smaller planets rotate around bigger planets, it's a gravitational pull. Thats just how we know the universe to work. ??????????????????? That surely shows that the universe is not chaotic and from that I infer that it is ordain and sustained supernaturally and that this generations of scientist are working toward some understanding of it, only God knows how long before they can understand it and they are not that far advanced in their understating that the King. They don’t know how the universe works yet. What I am certain of it that is not the product of chance.![]() |
|
#266
|
|||
|
|||
|
A non-chaotic universe ordained and sustained supernaturally by God the Almighty.
|
|
#267
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am thinking of buying a book that could help and I can decide yet Dembski or Pope Benedict In a new book, Creation and Evolution, published Wednesday in German, the pope praised progress gained by science, but cautioned that evolution raises philosophical questions science alone cannot answer.
"The question is not to either make a decision for a creationism that fundamentally excludes science, or for an evolutionary theory that covers over its own gaps and does not want to see the questions that reach beyond the methodological possibilities of natural science," the pope said. |
|
#268
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Now your next point was, since it's not chaotic therefore it's supernatural. You have to prove supernatural cause, you can't just say, I don't know how this has happened, therefore it's supernatural. Which we went over, it's a gravitational pull, larger objects pull on smaller ones, I'm assuming you've been to high school well, maybe not, I don't know how old you are. To give up and say "god did it" is the biggest non answer, because it doesn't tell us anything, I mean what created god? Is he something that could be observed? your filling a gap of knowledge with a non answer. I'm sure it makes you feel comfortable, but I'd rather know the truth, and if we can't ever know the truth, than I'm happy saying I don't know, because it doesn't stop further investigation. |
|
#269
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#270
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just explain in scientific terms WHAT your problem is with ToE.
IF you only objection is theological than - who cares? Science doesn't deal with theology. You got a better scientific explanation for the diversity of life - post it. Until you DO ToE stands unrefuted. |