![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Can you see some errors in this theory? Do find it to be worth believing and why?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
There are always improvements that can be made to a scientific model. The sign is not the thing signified.
__________________
![]() Don't fence me in. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Lawrence, before answering you, can you tell me what you think the theory of evolution is?
__________________
"The sailor does not pray for wind, he learns to sail." Gustaf Lindborg |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
As a scientific theory, evolution is of course not absolutely correct. Much of what Darwin originally proposed has been corrected already, and it is expected to be improved further still as time passes.
That is normal and expected. That's how science works. As for believing in it, well, it is not really a matter of belief, unless perhaps you mean the origin of life itself. As Woman of Reason just told us in another thread, Evolution does not really have an answer for the origin of life (at least not yet). But as a model for the origin of species and a theoretical basis for Biology, it is quite simply unavoidable. It doesn't take any faith at all to accept it, and quite frankly, it is not worth the trouble to gather the faith to resist it either. It is, very simply, true. Way too much evidence of various kinds has been gathered to really put it in doubt. Doubting it is very much an exercise at feigning ignorance. It is a bit puzzling really that so many people resist it, when it is not even really much of a religious hazard. Strictly speaking, it is not even incompatible with Creationism, although there are many (myself included) who fully expect it to explain the origin of life as well. Just in case you didn't find it yet, there is a superb site about the matter: TalkOrigins Archive: Exploring the Creation/Evolution Controversy
__________________
------------------------------------------------------------------ Wikipedia junkie, Brazilian atheist / buddhist http://luisdantas.zip.net |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
And before answering that, why are you questioning me that way (I'm a student of science hoping to gather info on this thread and not to be questioned)? I'm here to ask if you can see any errors about the theory.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I believe it because it makes sense.
__________________
"When a man lies, he murders some part of the world." |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
What would you consider an "error" in the context of discussing a scientific theory? Ordinarily, that would mean that a variation on the model or an alternative model is more consistent with the observed evidence. Somehow, I don't think that's what you mean, though.
__________________
![]() Don't fence me in. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
And what do you mean by errors? Do you mean holes in the theory?
__________________
"The sailor does not pray for wind, he learns to sail." Gustaf Lindborg |
|
|