![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#51
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's always amusing when creationist say, It's just a theory as if that discredits evolution. There is a big difference between the definition of theory and a Scientific Theory. A Scientific theory is so much more than an abstract belief in something.
From Answers.com
__________________
The very corner-stone of an education must be to inspire the intensest love of truth: and this without a particle of regard to the results to which the exercise of that power may lead, even though it should conduct the pupil to opinions diametrically opposite to those of his teachers. John Mill |
|
#52
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#53
|
||||
|
||||
|
Please stop embarrassing yourself.
__________________
if G-d ( G-d is not 'X' for all 'X' )
|
|
#54
|
||||
|
||||
|
This a forum. Everyone is free to express ideas. Expressing an idea isn't embarrassing oneself.. End of the story..
|
|
#55
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
if G-d ( G-d is not 'X' for all 'X' )
|
|
#56
|
||||
|
||||
|
Jay has a tendency to try and put everyone down. Its his way of telling you that you're looking at things the wrong way.
|
|
#57
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re post:
Well I can see that there a lot of beliefs on this thread. I said that the theory of evolution is just a theory. But after researching my science reference, some scientists, specifically the biologists believe that it is a fact. Therefore, I will accept the theory as a theory and a scientific fact(as some biologists concluded). Sorry for those people whom I answered " Theory of Evolution is just a "broad" theory" I do accept my mistakes. However, many scientist have different beliefs in this issue too (you will be the best judge for their beliefs). For instance: "There is a widespread misconception that good theories grow up to be facts and that the really good ones finally become laws. But these three categories of scientific description are neither directly related nor mutually exclusive. It often occurs that a single natural phenomenon can be described in terms of a theory, a fact, and a law -- all at the same time! In conclusion, evolution is not observable, repeatable, or refutable and thus does not qualify as either a scientific fact or theory." By Dr. David N. Menton, Ph.D. "The Darwinian theory of descent has not a single fact to confirm it in the realm of nature. It is not the result of scientific research, but purely the product of imagination."—*Dr. Fleischman [Erlangen zoologist]. "I am not satisfied that Darwin proved his point or that his influence in scientific and public thinking has been beneficial . . the success of Darwinism was accomplished by a decline in scientific integrity."—*W.R. Thompson. Introduction to *Charles Darwin's, Origin of the Species [Canadian scientist]. "Evolutionism is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless."—*Bounoure, Le Monde Et La Vie [Director of Research at the National center of Scientific Research in France] "In fact, evolution became in a sense a scientific religion; almost all scientists have accepted it and many are prepared to `bend' their observations to fit in with it."—*H. Lipson, "A Physicist Looks at Evolution," Physics Bulletin "The problem of the origin of species has not advanced in the last 150 years. One hundred and fifty years have already passed during which it has been said that the evolution of the species is a fact but, without giving real proofs of it and without even a principle of explaining it. During the last one hundred and fifty years of research that has been carried out along this line [in order to prove the theory], there has been no discovery of anything. It is simply a repetition in different ways of what Darwin said in 1859. This lack of results is unforgivable in a day when molecular biology has really opened the veil covering the mystery of reproduction and heredity . . "Finally, there is only one attitude which is possible as I have just shown: It consists in affirming that intelligence comes before life. Many people will say this is not science, it is philosophy. The only thing I am interested in is fact, and this conclusion comes out of an analysis and observation of the facts."—*G. Salet, Hasard et Certitude: Le Transformisme devant la Biologie Actuelle |
|
#58
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
if G-d ( G-d is not 'X' for all 'X' )
|
|
#59
|
||||
|
||||
|
Did you know that facts and laws are not scientifically interesting... Do you know why?
Because they don`t explain anything! Theories explain things. Facts and laws don`t, they are just data. So don`t you start saying that theories are not important because they are not facts or laws... They are much more than that. They do what laws can`t do. They do what facts never did: They tell us how things works. The theory of evolution tells us how the fact of evolution works. |