Quote:
Originally Posted by little_monkey
True, but it is with these experiments that we will eventually discover the natural laws that exist out there which allows life to emerge from non-living thing.
|
Really? Maybe the experiments might end up showing that abiogenesis was in fact not possible without intelligent intervention within the (estimated)
finite constraints available in the field (not the lab) way back when.
Of-course I'm speaking rhetorically, because unfortunately that word 'estimated' is the killer. We'll never be able to say with certainty what happened either way. The best you can hope for is to show what may have happened, not what actually happened.
Quote:
Originally Posted by little_monkey
Once this is desmonstrable, meaning if it happened on this planet then it can happen anywhere in the universe, then the hypothesis of a creator to upstart life becomes superfluous.
|
You forgot to account for the sophisticated building blocks that precede abiogenesis, and so on and so forth. Certainly old earth creationist/theistic evolutionists would see such a result as a feather in their cap in the ongoing debate with the young earth creationists/literalists. On the other hand the YECers will say that we don't know what kind of original cell was required. It's not even close to being enough to end creationism as we know it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by little_monkey
Life, like gravity, is then just a series of events following natural laws.
|
Until a free moral agent consciously and deliberately ends another life..........
Hmmm KFC time
