|
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
05-06-2008, 05:58 AM
|
||||
|
||||
The term they are looking for is "Biologist."
The use of the term "Evolutionist" contributes to the widespread misapprehension that the Theory of Evolution is the the theory that there is no God.
__________________
Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong. -Thomas Jefferson 
|
|
#22
05-06-2008, 06:05 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree. I think it creates the perception that it is coherent to accept some of the findings of empirical analysis but not all of them. Science isn't pick 'n' mix.
__________________
|
|
#23
05-06-2008, 06:31 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Actually, I see nothing wrong with the term "evolutionist", we use the terms physicist, and chemist for the study and practice of those disciplines. Letting "creationists" control the dialogue I believe is a mistake.
__________________
freethinker - deluxe "Religions are all alike - founded upon fables and mythologies." Thomas Jefferson freethinker - deluxe
|
|
#24
05-06-2008, 10:40 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, I think that would be an evolutionary biologist.
__________________
Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong. -Thomas Jefferson
|
Linear Mode
