![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
I've spent a long time studying evolution (in all its forms) as well as studying the Bible (in all its forms, but mostly in Hebrew and Koine Greek).
I've come to the conclusion that evolution does not follow the scientific method in that one can only assume or infer an event that cannot have been observed. The idea that, somehow, we evolved from amino acids in a soup billions of years ago is so laughably improbable I wonder why anyone takes it seriously. (In fact, I kick myself for previously believing such.) But that brings us to the Genesis creation account. Bear in mind that Moses is the author of Genesis, and Jesus himself attested to the veracity of the old testament, Genesis included. Moses got his information from God directly on the top of Mt. Sinai, so if what he wrote was doubtful or incorrect, 40 days and 40 nights was plenty of time to raise his hand to ask for clarification. So, the logical conclusion would be that either the Genesis account of creation is true, or God is frankly a bold faced liar. (A caveat: I am, just as I do with "Origin of Species" et al., taking the validity of the authorship of Genesis at face value, for purposes of this discussion.) So, if evolution is true, God must be a liar. If you are an atheist, you shouldn't have a problem at all with this. If you are a Christian, however, it might be prudent to examine the alleged science behind evolution, to come to a more fully formed decision. Love the back and forth... JC Masters |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm not sure I understand this. How would taking God literally impede on one's ability to accept evolution and alike?
__________________
"Man can be defined as an animal that makes dogmas. . . . " G.K. Chesterton |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
The Best Of The Merry Men. |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
The Best Of The Merry Men. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Priests have led you to believe there is a battle between God and science because they realized they were losing their power over the people. Once scientists began to explain storms, meteors, comets, eclipses, and earthquakes, the people no longer ran scared to the local holyman for his interpretation of the "signs". God created the universe, nothing science discovers could possibly go against God. The scientists are revealing the clues to God's great creation. God is the original scientist. |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
The Best Of The Merry Men. |
|
#19
|
||||
|