![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Tell me what you all think about this? Has this been discussed before? This is how I,as a Christian, understand the creation...and believe in the old earth explanation...to me this is where the dinosaurs, possible cave men and all that stuff happened....
In the Beginning...(before the first day of creation - not time), God allowed Jesus to do the creating (Colossians 1:16) the heavens (plural) and the earth (John 1:3). Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the face of the deep (means the earth was flooded, desolate, and in darkness)...this means the earth was not created without form & void, but that it "became" that way at some point in time after it was created. Without form means to lie waste, a desolation (you cannot lie waste or make desolate something unless it was once in good condition). For some reason, God destroyed everything on the old earth for some reason...this was not like Noah's Flood, this destruction was total, complete, nothing or no one survived...even the heavens were destroyed. This all means the earth was here before the first day of creation. 2 Peter 3:5-7 tells me there was a previous world on the face of this earth before Jesus created the present world of modern man. Does this not invalidate the Doctrine of a Young Earth Creationism and opens a more perfect way to understanding how and why the Bible and the Geological Record are in agreement. I can visualize the "waters" (plural) could have been ice covered with a dark atmosphere. This theory could explain why the woolly mammoths were frozen so quickly that many still had food in their mouths. Okay...this is a start...let me hear what you think? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Gap creationism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia It's certainly a lot easier to defend than young earth creationism. But it does throw up some possible doctrinal issues in the eyes of some: What About the Gap & Ruin-Reconstruction Theories? - Answers in Genesis |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Interesting...I did not know all this information you supplied existed...you have any personal ideas as to why it could be wrong?
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
From each according to his interest rate, to each according to his credit. ![]() -Capitalist Manifesto-
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I just looked at another Thread discussing basically the same thing...guess I should have looked before I started this one....
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
The earth being formless and void simply indicates that there was something primordial that God used to create the earth. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
From each according to his interest rate, to each according to his credit. ![]() -Capitalist Manifesto-
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
__________________
if G-d ( G-d is not 'X' for all 'X' )
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Excuse me...Jay. If it puts you to sleep...why respond? Oh...I suppose that I'm not as highly evolved as you or have I "arrived"....
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
My first thought is that you don't know science very well. My second thought is perhaps you might try tackling topics that are within your reach. There is no problem with having lofty goals, however those goals should be attainable for them to have any real value. Aside from this your "theory" cannot be "proven" nor "disproven", (oh heck, it cannot even be tested) so really... what is the point.
__________________
It is true that the early bird gets the worm, however, it is the second mouse, that gets the cheese. Last edited by YmirGF; 12-17-2007 at 09:27 PM. |
|
#10
|
||
|
|