The Story of Creation (As I Understand) (Jesus, Earth, dinosaur)

[Jayhawker Soule]

Originally Posted by Green Kepi

Oh...I suppose that I'm not as highly evolved as you ....

That would be one explanation but not one that a naturalist would be likely to embrace.

[angellous_evangellous]

Originally Posted by YmirGF

My first thought is that you don't know science very well.

... or biblical interpretation...

My second thought is perhaps you might try tackling topics that are within your reach. There is no problem with having lofty goals, however those goals should be attainable for them to have any real value. Aside from this your "theory" cannot be "proven" not "disproven", so really... what is the point.

Not sure I agree here... we're just talking about stuff, and it's healthy to continually try and move forward, even if the steps are very small.

[rocketman]

Originally Posted by Green Kepi

Interesting...I did not know all this information you supplied existed...

Have fun, but remember, proving things is different to having an opinion about them, so be careful not to present other peoples opinions as fact in debates.

Originally Posted by Green Kepi

you have any personal ideas as to why it could be wrong?

Not really. Both views depend on interpretation. If I say 'God did it' I don't care how he did it. Maybe your view is correct, but it would be hard to prove physically... At the end of the day all creation theories are taken on faith. It's not a test case for salvation.

[GreenKepi]

Appreciate it Rocketman...at least you didn't respond to me as a little thinker and unlearned....

[painted wolf]

Without form means to lie waste, a desolation (you cannot lie waste or make desolate something unless it was once in good condition).

I thought it meant.. you know without form... no shape, or definition.

And the mammoth that was found with grass still in it mouth was found to have died from a bad fall while feeding. It wasn't "flash frozen" or standing... the poor thing was laying down and the ground fell in on it burying it and finishing it off.

"Before I arrived at the site, Herz had partially dug away the hill of earth
round the body, and so both the forefeet and the hind feet were exposed.
These lay under the body so that it rested on them. When one looked at the
body one had the impression that it must have suddenly fallen into an
unexpected fissure in the ice, which it probably came across in its
wanderings, and which may have been covered with a layer of plant-bearing
mould. After its fall the unlucky animal must have tried to get out of its
hopeless position, for the right forefoot was doubled up and the left
stretched forward as if it had struggled to rise. But its strength had
apparently not been up to it, for when we dug it out still farther we found
that in its fall it had not only broken several bones, but had been almost
completely buried by the falls of earth which tumbled in on it, so that it
had suffocated.

"Its death must have occurred very quickly after its fall, for we found
half-chewed food still in its mouth, between the back teeth and on its
tongue, which was in good preservation. The food consisted of leaves and
grasses, some of the later carrying seeds. We could tell from these that
the mammoth must have come to its miserable end in the autumn."
- E. W. Pfizenmayer Siberian Man and Mammoth

wa:do

[sandy whitelinger]

Originally Posted by Green Kepi

Excuse me...Jay. If it puts you to sleep...why respond? Oh...I suppose that I'm not as highly evolved as you or have I "arrived"....

Antagonism, arrogance, condescencion and such like.

[sandy whitelinger]

Originally Posted by painted wolf

And the mammoth that was found with grass still in it mouth was found to have died from a bad fall while feeding. It wasn't "flash frozen" or standing... the poor thing was laying down and the ground fell in on it burying it and finishing it off.

wa:do

Wow, I didn't know you were there to witness this. Fascinating.