What Proof Does Evolution Offer For Natural Beginning Of Life (creation, genesis)

[kbc_1963]

This thread will accept only empirical evidence for natural / random beginnings of life.
assumptions and theories by science or personal belief are not empirical evidence.

[HelpMe]

i honestly wish they would return the previous thread.and i agree with your notion that acting members would not be moderators(or something to that effect).

[Ceridwen018]

kbc,

I created a thread called "Evidence FOR the creationism theory." So far, it remains blank. Perhaps you might have something to post?

[Jaiket]

Evolutionary theory needs not provide the answers for that one. Maybe you should re-word your question.

Regarding your last topic, I read it and found it interesting and well argued. Was it deleted?

[Seyorni]

Scientific theories don't proove things. Proof occurrs in mathematics. Science accumulates evidence for and tries to falsify theories.

I don't think the genesis of the 1st germ of life is a major focus of evolutionists. Evolutionists explore the mechanisms of the observable fact of morphological change.

[HelpMe]

mathetmatics proves evolution?not science?or are 'evolutionists' a completely different entity?it's blatent that the scientific community has not tried to disprove evolution but it has put forth much effort to prove it.

[Jaiket]

Originally Posted by HelpMe

it's blatent that the scientific community has not tried to disprove evolution but it has put forth much effort to prove it.

Damn. With the blatant evidence you have uncovered I suggest you expose the worldwide scientific conspiracy of having "not tried to disprove evolution".

We may as well go home lads the truth is out. And all that effort...

[HelpMe]

Originally Posted by truthseekingsoul

We may as well go home lads the truth is out. And all that effort...

since i wasn't referring to the end product of all the study, only to the biased approach(is your sarcasm an opposal?).why doth thou moan?

[Jaiket]

It is not the job of evolutionary scientists to disprove anything. Science relies on observations, what a scientist observes the scientists records. Regardless of the intentions of the researcher the recordings should be unbiased. Now are you suggesting that biologists are setting up lab work with the results pre-concieved?

[HelpMe]

'should be's often differ from truths.

do i believe that evolution was made before any supposed evidence for it showed up?no, do i believe that this theory was adopted quite a bit more easily than other theories more deserving of attention?..