![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#51
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I disagree with you Mr Emu...just as both the Ptolemaic and the Copernican models of the unvierse were based on observable fact, so are ID and abiogenesis. The difference, my friend, is that one is scientific, the other is not. ID theory makes no predictions, so it is impossible to falsify--a requirement for any valid scientific theory. Abiogenesis in no way denies the existence of an intelligent creator, as ID proponents would have everyone believe. An intelligent designer could create life via abiogenesis just as easily as he could wave his hand and *poof!* make the first cells appear out of thin air.
__________________
"Is there any problem in life that can't be solved by bending?" -Bender, of Futurama
|
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
|
Let me wrap this thread up!
Continue the results of this thread in Intelligent Design in the classroom |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |