Religious Education Forum  

Welcome to Religious Forums
Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page!

Home Who's Online Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Religious Education Forum / Religious Topics / Religious Debates / Evolution Vs. Creationism
Sitemap Popular RF Forums REGISTER Search Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 03-02-2006, 10:39 AM
JerryL's Avatar
JerryL Offline
Title:Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tampabay
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,903
Frubals: 25363
JerryL has much to be proud of
JerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Yes, and logic would assume that
logic doesn't assume.

Quote:
Jerry, your post is meaningless. I said a kind could be defined at the genetic level
No, you said "The only way a 'kind' could be defined would be at the genetic level"

Can you not remember your own quotes or are you just lying?

Quote:
I said it is not yet possible to do this, nor will it ever likely be so
Actually, you put that it was impossible to define kind *before* you brought up genetics. You then proceeded to define kind. Your post is self-contrary.

Quote:
If your understanding of genetics is anything like your understanding of geology and how radiodating actually works then it's no wonder you see things in this light. Why must it be defined genetically? Because it's quantitative.
So is defining "kind" by color. Tell me how we know it's not "by color"...
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-02-2006, 10:48 AM
angellous_evangellous's Avatar
angellous_evangellous Offline
Religion: Christian
Title:pater familias
Prolific Poster Award:  - Issue reason: 10,000 posts Scholarship Award:  - Issue reason: This award has been given to your peers and is well deserved. Humor Award:  - Issue reason: This award has been given to you by your peers and is well deserved. Article Award:  - Issue reason:  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: D/FW, TX
Gender: Male
Posts: 23,570
Frubals: 4450110
angellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whore
angellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whore
angellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whore
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JerryL
logic doesn't assume
That's what I said!
Quote:
Originally Posted by angellous_evangellous
Logic makes no assumptions.
To which I got this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Endless
We assume that our logic is correct - therefore the outcome of the logic train of thought is technically an asumption. Anyway that's just getting picky.
__________________
Obama loves Jesus - vote for the sake of Christ
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-02-2006, 10:49 AM
JerryL's Avatar
JerryL Offline
Title:Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tampabay
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,903
Frubals: 25363
JerryL has much to be proud of
JerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Tell me this - which was copied from which?
Noah was copied from Giglgamesh. In addition to the fact that the writings themselves are more consistant (and that the story of Gilgamesh is more consistant with Babylonian mythology than Noah with prophetic Judaism, there's the matter of local.

Around 5500BCE, with rising sea levels in the Med, the Bosphorous portal flooded and the indegenious people fled. One of those groups fled into what became Babylon. The story they tell (particualrly the dating by line of kings) and the fact that they are decended from the Black Sea groups (there's a sudden change in styles in the area after the flood) strongly indicates that the story of the flood of Gilgamesh is the fictionalization of the flooding of the Black Sea.

The Babylonians, and the the Persians, conqured the Isrealits (likely descendants of the Hittites). When they did, the Isrealites began to incorporate Babylonian and then Persian beliefs into their own (it's no coincidence that Shatan (he who opposes) shows up in Hebrew writings after the arrivial of the dualistic Zoroastrians, and takes the form of the snake, the symbol of Babylon)

Quote:
How about we now study the Gilgamesh account of the flood as well - perhaps we should interpret the biblical account according to that? Maybe we should interpret kinds by that too.
According to the story, the Gods became jealous of men, and upset with their ways. They tried plagues and fire and all sorts of stuff but mankind was resistant. So the Gods decided to flood the world. One of the gods, who liked man, decided to save mankind; so she taught Gilgamesh how to build an ark and protect his family. He took animals with him, particualarly sacrifical animals (Gods like sacrifices) and the Gods flooded the world. Only then the Gods missed the sacrifices and man. The Goddess said that she could restore man but only if the gods promised to never again try to wipe all the men out. They agreed and the flood eneded. Gilgamesh sacrificed animals to the Gods who were again happy, and the goddess took off her jeweled necklace and threw it in the air (the first rainbow) as a sign, when it rains or floods, that the Gods remember their promise not to killl everyone.

Quote:
The thing you have to do is find out which came first - whether they did indeed have access or whether it was 2 separate accounts. I'm not about to get into a debate off topic about history. Save to say that if you are going to try and interpret the Biblical definition of kinds, it helps to try and understand it within the context of the Bible. So the Bible according to the chronologies would make the earth out to be ~7000yrs old. This is what the people reading the chronologies would have been lead to believe - therefore either way, we understand kind within this context.
Unless it's a metaphore... or just wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-02-2006, 10:52 AM
angellous_evangellous's Avatar
angellous_evangellous Offline
Religion: Christian
Title:pater familias
Prolific Poster Award:  - Issue reason: 10,000 posts Scholarship Award:  - Issue reason: This award has been given to your peers and is well deserved. Humor Award:  - Issue reason: This award has been given to you by your peers and is well deserved. Article Award:  - Issue reason:  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: D/FW, TX
Gender: Male
Posts: 23,570
Frubals: 4450110
angellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whore
angellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whore
angellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whore
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JerryL
The Babylonians, and the the Persians, conqured the Isrealits (likely descendants of the Hittites). When they did, the Isrealites began to incorporate Babylonian and then Persian beliefs into their own (it's no coincidence that Shatan (he who opposes) shows up in Hebrew writings after the arrivial of the dualistic Zoroastrians, and takes the form of the snake, the symbol of Babylon)
Wasn't the Gilgamesh story Sumerian (compare to the Akkaidians and Ugarit) and already available in the Palestine area before the Babylonian captivity?
__________________
Obama loves Jesus - vote for the sake of Christ

Last edited by angellous_evangellous; 03-02-2006 at 10:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 03-02-2006, 11:07 AM
Endless Offline
Title:Sophmore Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Gender: Undisclosed
Posts: 307
Frubals: 1001
Endless will become famous soon enoughEndless will become famous soon enoughEndless will become famous soon enoughEndless will become famous soon enough
Default

I'd be careful of deviating too much from the discussion on 'kinds' - i don't think a debate in history (although it would be interesting) has its place in Evolution v Creation.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 03-02-2006, 11:11 AM
angellous_evangellous's Avatar
angellous_evangellous Offline
Religion: Christian
Title:pater familias
Prolific Poster Award:  - Issue reason: 10,000 posts Scholarship Award:  - Issue reason: This award has been given to your peers and is well deserved. Humor Award:  - Issue reason: This award has been given to you by your peers and is well deserved. Article Award:  - Issue reason:  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: D/FW, TX
Gender: Male
Posts: 23,570
Frubals: 4450110
angellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whore
angellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whore
angellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whoreangellous_evangellous is a Frubal Whore
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Endless
I'd be careful of deviating too much from the discussion on 'kinds' - i don't think a debate in history (although it would be interesting) has its place in Evolution v Creation.
It most certainly does, because the history of the document dictates what kind of document we are reading. History tells us that Genesis is a myth and must be interpreted as a myth, which has direct impact on how we interpret the word translated "kind" and how we determine what relationship, if any, the myth has with science.
__________________
Obama loves Jesus - vote for the sake of Christ
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 03-02-2006, 11:19 AM
Endless Offline
Title:Sophmore Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Gender: Undisclosed
Posts: 307
Frubals: 1001
Endless will become famous soon enoughEndless will become famous soon enoughEndless will become famous soon enoughEndless will become famous soon enough
Default

Ok assuming it is all a myth - is there any reason to try and find out what kind means now?
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 03-02-2006, 11:51 AM
JerryL's Avatar
JerryL Offline
Title:Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tampabay
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,903
Frubals: 25363
JerryL has much to be proud of
JerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by angellous_evangellous
Wasn't the Gilgamesh story Sumerian (compare to the Akkaidians and Ugarit) and already available in the Palestine area before the Babylonian captivity?
Variotions on the story appear in many cultures from the region; but I believe you are correct in your statement here.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 03-02-2006, 12:41 PM
kevmicsmi's Avatar
kevmicsmi Offline
Religion: Bible
Title:Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Denver
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,350
Frubals: 31220
kevmicsmi has much to be proud of
kevmicsmi has much to be proud ofkevmicsmi has much to be proud ofkevmicsmi has much to be proud ofkevmicsmi has much to be proud ofkevmicsmi has much to be proud ofkevmicsmi has much to be proud ofkevmicsmi has much to be proud ofkevmicsmi has much to be proud ofkevmicsmi has much to be proud ofkevmicsmi has much to be proud ofkevmicsmi has much to be proud ofkevmicsmi has much to be proud ofkevmicsmi has much to be proud ofkevmicsmi has much to be proud ofkevmicsmi has much to be proud ofkevmicsmi has much to be proud ofkevmicsmi has much to be proud ofkevmicsmi has much to be proud ofkevmicsmi has much to be proud ofkevmicsmi has much to be proud ofkevmicsmi has much to be proud ofkevmicsmi has much to be proud ofkevmicsmi has much to be proud ofkevmicsmi has much to be proud of
Default

Accordiing to the biblical story of the tower of Babel, you would expect to find differing stories of a flood around the world which you do.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/flood-myths.html
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 03-02-2006, 01:34 PM
JerryL's Avatar
JerryL Offline
Title:Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tampabay
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,903
Frubals: 25363
JerryL has much to be proud of
JerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by