proof against evolution (Creator, Darwin, creation, genesis, science)

[Majikthise]

"Evolution is not theory, it is fact."

Carl Sagan (The One True God)

[JerryL]

Originally Posted by randb

Mass isn't always conserved...Anyone with a basic knowledge of nuclear physics would say that mass isn't conserved in nuclear reactions... BTW... hi everyone!!!

Actually, mass is always conserved, even in nuclear physics. The loss of mass in (for example) a chunk of uranium exists in the mass of the emissions.

Matter is not always concerved, it can convert to energy; but matter-energy (which are the same thing as already pointed out) is always concerved.

[goldfish]

Proof of evolution, its a one word arguement. "Dinosaurs". Are they just a practicle joke played by God on Humanity, or did he just forget to mention them. If it is a practicle joke then I love gods sense of humour.

More proof of evolution, Two word arguement. "Chuck Norris". Again I love Gods sense of Humour.

[MidnightBlue]

Originally Posted by ladylazarus

No, God is not energy. Energy is energy. God is god (and also imaginary). They are different words that have different meanings, and it is not your place to redefine them.

A god who equals energy is certainly imaginary. That's not just bad science, it's bad theism.

[i believe in tranquility]

so for the athiests here: proove to me that evolution is the reason we are here: I MEAN THE WHOLE THING, FROM EVEN BEFORE OUR PLANTED WA FORMED.

go ahead...i got to see this...

[Alien_Youth]

3I would say that with an application of Einstein's theory it pretty much proves the existance of God due to the axiom that there has to be something that was here to give form to the universe hence a higher power

[JerryL]

Originally Posted by i believe in tranquility

so for the athiests here: proove to me that evolution is the reason we are here: I MEAN THE WHOLE THING, FROM EVEN BEFORE OUR PLANTED WA FORMED.

go ahead...i got to see this...

Wrong thread.

[i believe in tranquility]

how so^ im just building my argument..ull see after someone leaves a response.

[darkwaldo]

Originally Posted by Alien_Youth

3I would say that with an application of Einstein's theory it pretty much proves the existance of God due to the axiom that there has to be something that was here to give form to the universe hence a higher power

Wouldn't there have to be something to give form to the higher power? If the theory does prove that there is a higher power then how do you know that it is the god you worship? There could be a whole universe of gods out there. For all you know, this universe could be a failed science project. I think we should spend more time trying to understand what we can, without making things more unexplainable.

[Ibrahim Al-Amin]

I belong to a group of scientists who do not subscribe to a conventional religion but nevertheless deny that the universe is a purposeless accident. Through my scientific work I have come to believe more and more strongly that the physical universe is put together with an ingenuity so astonishing that I cannot accept it merely as a brute fact. There must, it seems to me, be a deeper level of explanation. Whether one wishes to call that deeper level "God" is a matter of taste and definition. --Paul Davies