![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Evolution is more logical then creationism, no? I am a sopomore, in high school, writing a paper, I need opions thank you.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, there's the idea that life developed and changed drastically over time and there's the story involving naked people and snakes...I suppose you can take your pick (oh, but I'm biased
). Yeah, I find evolution more logical. Others disagree, as you may have noticed.
__________________
צדק צדק תרדף למען תחיה |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I find both equally illogical, but I choose to believe in creationism. Sometimes God isn't logical. And what he can do is almost impossible for us to wrap our heads around.
__________________
I start the threads that make the whole forum scream.
![]() |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, there's the idea that life developed and changed drastically over time and there's the story involving naked people and snakes...I suppose you can take your pick (oh, but I'm biased
). Yeah, I find evolution more logical. Others disagree, as you may have noticed.While they may not be more logical you must admit stories about naked people with snakes are always more interesting. The fossil record has got nothing on naked people with snakes as far as exciting reading. ![]()
__________________
If my calculations are correct .. SLINKY + ESCALATOR = EVERLASTING FUN Last edited by linwood; 03-24-2005 at 01:46 AM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ooh, good point.
__________________
צדק צדק תרדף למען תחיה |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
The theory of evolution is based on a "missing link". The scientific evidence actually shows that man simply appeared on earth. I propose that God did create the physical world, and this is not at variance with science. If we look at science and religion with open minds and independently investigate the truth, we will see that they support each other.
__________________
I think maybe I think too much (there I go again!) |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
TVOR
__________________
"The religious fanatics didn't buy the republican party because it was virtuous, they bought it because it was for sale". |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
I am so hip I have difficulty seeing over my pelvis.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
The tongue of the wise uses knowledge aright: but the Mouth of fools pours out foolishness. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
The most logical approach is creation by evolution. This gives you answers for both HOW as well as WHO! Evolution never tries to answer who, and the Bible was never intended to be a science text book. Neither proves nor disproves the other and those who foment the idea that they are mutually incompatible have an agenda (especially that TVOR character!
)
__________________
On sabbatical until things become fun again.
Reach me at NetDoc@ScubaBoard.com or on www.ScubaBoard.com. |