Religious Education Forum  

Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page!
Home Who's Online Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Religious Education Forum / Religious Topics / Religious Debates / Evolution Vs. Creationism
Sitemap Popular RF Forums REGISTER Search Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-30-2010, 01:10 PM
Big_TJ Offline
Religion: agnostic
Title:Sophomore Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: somewhere
Gender: Male
Posts: 483
Frubals: 34
Big_TJ has a pet name for each frubal
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flatland View Post
The creationist's understanding of Evolution is non-existent. Kinda like their fairy tale.
So I guess you cannot argue against it, then?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-30-2010, 01:12 PM
Big_TJ Offline
Religion: agnostic
Title:Sophomore Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: somewhere
Gender: Male
Posts: 483
Frubals: 34
Big_TJ has a pet name for each frubal
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kilgore Trout View Post
I've never met anyone opposed to evolutionary theory who has actually demonstrated even a basic understanding of what it is.
This is EXACTLY what this thread will prove!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-30-2010, 01:15 PM
Big_TJ Offline
Religion: agnostic
Title:Sophomore Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: somewhere
Gender: Male
Posts: 483
Frubals: 34
Big_TJ has a pet name for each frubal
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TJ73 View Post
But theory is not fact. We use reason to imagine how things might be and apply science to try to prove or disprove. Have not all great theories started in the mind of scientists? The take the known facts and think ( or imagine) how it could tie into the things we don;t yet know and we continue to look for proof. Once the proof is established we THEN have facts.
umm . . . should I start a thread marked "Creationist, what is your understanding of the "Scientific Method"?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-30-2010, 01:26 PM
outhouse's Avatar
outhouse Online!
Religion: atheisticly
Title:Vanquishing Member
Shield of 10,000 Thoughts: Awarded for contributing 10,000 posts - Issue reason: For 10,000 posts 
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Auburn Ca
Gender: Male
Posts: 21,907
Frubals: 424
outhouse experimented with frubals in college but never inhaledouthouse experimented with frubals in college but never inhaledouthouse experimented with frubals in college but never inhaledouthouse experimented with frubals in college but never inhaledouthouse experimented with frubals in college but never inhaledouthouse experimented with frubals in college but never inhaledouthouse experimented with frubals in college but never inhaled
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big_TJ View Post
umm . . . should I start a thread marked "Creationist, what is your understanding of the "Scientific Method"?
you will have a blank and empty thread.

I have not witnesssed one with a clue
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-30-2010, 01:48 PM
Breathe Offline
Title:Taking a break, again.
Shield of Creativity: Awarded for wonderfully original and innovative thinking - Issue reason: For your exceptional and original contributions to the forum Shield of Peace: Awarded for exceptional effort in upholding and promoting the peace - Issue reason:  Shield of 10,000 Thoughts: Awarded for contributing 10,000 posts - Issue reason: For 10,000 posts!! Congrats Carl!! 
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Gender: Undisclosed
Posts: 17,080
Frubals: 1629
Breathe watches videos of frubals running in slow motion to see them jiggle
Breathe watches videos of frubals running in slow motion to see them jiggleBreathe watches videos of frubals running in slow motion to see them jiggleBreathe watches videos of frubals running in slow motion to see them jiggleBreathe watches videos of frubals running in slow motion to see them jiggleBreathe watches videos of frubals running in slow motion to see them jiggleBreathe watches videos of frubals running in slow motion to see them jiggleBreathe watches videos of frubals running in slow motion to see them jiggleBreathe watches videos of frubals running in slow motion to see them jiggle
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TJ73 View Post
But theory is not fact.
Ahhh, but as 9-10ths (I think it was him, apologies if not!) said before:

Scientific theory = Layman's fact
Scientific hypothesis = Layman's theory


Gravity and relativity are still "theories"--even though one does not see much argument against gravity.





To creationists, all I suppose I can say is [added so TJ73 doesn't think I'm singling her out ]:


There is plenty of evidence for evolution out there, and I've seen some of them for myself (not that I have ever denied evolution, although I did Poe once. ) - check out the "London underground mosquito", search for "culex pipiens molestus evolve" or something.

Link here.

A major problem that many who do not understand evolution have with it is simply that they misunderstand what it is and how it happens. Some people, for example, seem to have the idea that one day a lizard gives birth to an egg from which comes a chicken, or a toad turns into a human and stuff, but this is not it at all.


I would suggest to any "anti-evolutionist" to read up on what it actually is.

Evolution is a Fact and a Theory
Introduction to Evolutionary Biology
Five Major Misconceptions about Evolution

Another major problem is many creationists seem to think evolution and God have to be at odds. This is not true: I believe in God, and I accept evolution as fact - and that's not the theistic evolution either some believe in, either. No "guided evolution" for me, just, pure chaos, and I don't think that affects my spirituality one iota.



Just my two cents.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-30-2010, 02:11 PM
LuisDantas's Avatar
LuisDantas Offline
Religion: Ath/Agn, Buddhist
Title:Aura of atheification
Shield of Labour: Awarded for admirable hard work and development of a cause - Issue reason: For your exceptional work at helping to make this a better forum Shield of 20,000 Thoughts: Awarded for contributing 20,000 posts - Issue reason: Congrats Luis! I'll bet at least half were in the reports forum. 
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Curitiba, Brazil
Gender: Male
Posts: 20,908
Frubals: 1248
LuisDantas bores visitors with stories and photographs of this vast frubal collection
LuisDantas bores visitors with stories and photographs of this vast frubal collectionLuisDantas bores visitors with stories and photographs of this vast frubal collectionLuisDantas bores visitors with stories and photographs of this vast frubal collectionLuisDantas bores visitors with stories and photographs of this vast frubal collectionLuisDantas bores visitors with stories and photographs of this vast frubal collection
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flatland View Post
The creationist's understanding of Evolution is non-existent. Kinda like their fairy tale.
That is often enough true, but it can change. That is why this thread exists, after all.
__________________
Wikipedia junkie, Brazilian atheist / buddhist
http://luisdantas.zip.net; see Itinerant Lurker's handy guide to forum quoting syntax

Click here to read and make suggestions for the glossary of Dharmic terms that I am compiling. See the links on the second post.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-30-2010, 02:13 PM
LuisDantas's Avatar
LuisDantas Offline
Religion: Ath/Agn, Buddhist
Title:Aura of atheification
Shield of Labour: Awarded for admirable hard work and development of a cause - Issue reason: For your exceptional work at helping to make this a better forum Shield of 20,000 Thoughts: Awarded for contributing 20,000 posts - Issue reason: Congrats Luis! I'll bet at least half were in the reports forum. 
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Curitiba, Brazil
Gender: Male
Posts: 20,908
Frubals: 1248
LuisDantas bores visitors with stories and photographs of this vast frubal collection
LuisDantas bores visitors with stories and photographs of this vast frubal collectionLuisDantas bores visitors with stories and photographs of this vast frubal collectionLuisDantas bores visitors with stories and photographs of this vast frubal collectionLuisDantas bores visitors with stories and photographs of this vast frubal collectionLuisDantas bores visitors with stories and photographs of this vast frubal collection
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TJ73 View Post
I understand it to be the construct in which God has created. A determined amount of material and outcomes. Life building up to its current form, mailable to ride on the current of changing conditions. A creation with potentials. There are numerous ways the conditions can change, movement of the earths plates, other environmental changes and a means of life adapting to those changes, the means(DNA) being part of the design by the Creator.
Sorry, but I'm not certain I understood you. Are you saying that you accept the ToE, but don't believe that life wasn't created by the Will of God?
__________________
Wikipedia junkie, Brazilian atheist / buddhist
http://luisdantas.zip.net; see Itinerant Lurker's handy guide to forum quoting syntax

Click here to read and make suggestions for the glossary of Dharmic terms that I am compiling. See the links on the second post.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-30-2010, 03:35 PM
TJ73's Avatar
TJ73 Offline
Religion: God help me
Title:Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: NY State
Gender: Female
Posts: 957
Frubals: 100
TJ73 added a shed out back to store more frubalsTJ73 added a shed out back to store more frubals
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LuisDantas View Post
Sorry, but I'm not certain I understood you. Are you saying that you accept the ToE, but don't believe that life wasn't created by the Will of God?
Yes I do. I know the fact that I believe in God is ridiculous to some of you. No problem, but please don't discount my intelligence. I wasn't arguing that TOE has not been proven. It is obvious and I am not under the naive impression that it means monkey will eventually become people. I am aware of the simultaneous existence of other hominids along with homo sapiens. I know we were not Neanderthals at one time. I am fully able to grasp the rather simple and elegant process of natural selection. I just happen to believe that this process had an intelligent originator, one that caste out the fundamental elements of the process and is aware of all potentials.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-30-2010, 03:41 PM
LuisDantas's Avatar
LuisDantas Offline
Religion: Ath/Agn, Buddhist
Title:Aura of atheification
Shield of Labour: Awarded for admirable hard work and development of a cause - Issue reason: For your exceptional work at helping to make this a better forum Shield of 20,000 Thoughts: Awarded for contributing 20,000 posts - Issue reason: Congrats Luis! I'll bet at least half were in the reports forum. 
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Curitiba, Brazil
Gender: Male
Posts: 20,908
Frubals: 1248
LuisDantas bores visitors with stories and photographs of this vast frubal collection
LuisDantas bores visitors with stories and photographs of this vast frubal collectionLuisDantas bores visitors with stories and photographs of this vast frubal collectionLuisDantas bores visitors with stories and photographs of this vast frubal collectionLuisDantas bores visitors with stories and photographs of this vast frubal collectionLuisDantas bores visitors with stories and photographs of this vast frubal collection
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TJ73 View Post
Yes I do. I know the fact that I believe in God is ridiculous to some of you.
Not to me, for whatever it is worth. It is with some conceptions of what God is like and how his Will supposed acts that I have a problem.


Quote:
No problem, but please don't discount my intelligence. I wasn't arguing that TOE has not been proven. It is obvious and I am not under the naive impression that it means monkey will eventually become people. I am aware of the simultaneous existence of other hominids along with homo sapiens. I know we were not Neanderthals at one time. I am fully able to grasp the rather simple and elegant process of natural selection. I just happen to believe that this process had an intelligent originator, one that caste out the fundamental elements of the process and is aware of all potentials.
Then I am glad that I asked. Seems that some people may have jumped the gun while answering you. Then again, I don't think you are part of the target group that this thread was created for.
__________________
Wikipedia junkie, Brazilian atheist / buddhist
http://luisdantas.zip.net; see Itinerant Lurker's handy guide to forum quoting syntax

Click here to read and make suggestions for the glossary of Dharmic terms that I am compiling. See the links on the second post.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-30-2010, 03:47 PM
TJ73's Avatar
TJ73 Offline
Religion: God help me
Title:Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: NY State
Gender: Female
Posts: 957
Frubals: 100
TJ73 added a shed out back to store more frubalsTJ73 added a shed out back to store more frubals
Default

thank you. I appreciate your understanding of what I said. What group is the target?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:32 PM.


Copyright 2014 Advameg, Inc.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.