![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#41
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Atoms don't create themselves and they certainly don't create the laws that govern themselves then somehow give life to themselves. |
|
#42
|
||||
|
||||
|
If there's proof show it to me.Just because science does not answer every question about the universe doesn't automatically mean there's a god.This is a tactic used by the god addled for centries.Its called the GOD GAP .But as science advances the gap gets smaller and smaller. Also I don't have to prove god doesn't exist.Its YOUR premis that he/it exists so its upto you to prove it.
Last edited by rasor; 07-04-2007 at 03:51 AM. |
|
#43
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's not up to me to prove anything to you. You made a claim that you cannot prove and I made a claim I cannot prove yet in your twisted logic only I have to provide proof?
I cannot force God's hand. Why should He, or I, prove God to you? Also, the proof is in the pudding. What, you think pudding creates itself? I will tell you this, since there is no way that either of us can prove our concept we should look for the reason we have chosen to believe what we do. I know my reason, what's yours? |
|
#44
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#45
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sigh... you claimed there is no evidence but as I have said many times, the universe is the evidence.
So much for you being right. |
|
#46
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
If the universe is indeed evidence please explain how ??Notice that there is no scientific evidence There is no scientific evidence indicating that God exists. We all know that. For example:
If you think about it as a rational person, this lack of evidence is startling. There is not one bit of empirical evidence indicating that today's "God", nor any other contemporary god, nor any god of the past, exists. In addition we know that:
Last edited by rasor; 07-04-2007 at 01:08 PM. |
|
#47
|
||||
|
||||
|
Some say that if you take all the pieces of a complex watch and eternally toss them into the air that they will assemble themselves back together and form the watch again. But this is impossible and does not account for the fact that the universe didn't have an eternity to form correctly, it had to do it right the first time and in a precise order!
If the universe attempted to form but failed there is no second chance. Game over! The probability that a system as complex as the universe could form itself with such incredible precision and in an exact order is far, far, beyond impossible. For me, the fact that the universe is a creation of God is not disputable whatsoever but then, I didn't have a choice in the matter. For an atheist this same fact is eternally disputable because it is not something they want to see. They don't want to give up their freedom and individuality, and some atheists are just plain angry because they weren't born rich or because their daddy didn't give them enough attention or whatever. All of this proof that you want is already in the science books. |
|
#48
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have no idea what God is, but I choose to believe that the effect of "God" in my world is love, and forgiveness, and peace, and tolerance, and generosity. These effects are real enough. And until I know differently, I will continue to presume these effects to be of a divine nature. And I will do this because doing it makes my life better, and makes me a better person. I don't have to know God to choose God. All I have to know is the effect of choosing God.
|
|
#49
|
||||
|
||||
Some say that if you take all the pieces of a complex watch and eternally toss them into the air that they will assemble themselves back together and form the watch again. But this is impossible and does not account for the fact that the universe didn't have an eternity to form correctly, it had to do it right the first time and in a precise order!Really? and how do you know how much time was required ? and how do you know what is a correct universe ? If the universe attempted to form but failed there is no second chance. Game over! Again, How do you know this ? The probability that a system as complex as the universe could form itself with such incredible precision and in an exact order is far, far, beyond impossible. Again Who says its impossible ?For me, the fact that the universe is a creation of God is not disputable whatsoever but then, I didn't have a choice in the matter. Yes,but thats just you saying it.Your opinion is not proof. For an atheist this same fact is eternally disputable because it is not something they want to see. They don't want to give up their freedom and individuality, and some atheists are just plain angry because they weren't born rich or because their daddy didn't give them enough attention or whatever. Again,just your opinion without a shred of proof. All of this proof that you want is already in the science books. OK,so assuming its "in the science books" please show me a link to a relative science book . |
|
#50
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
That's looking at it backwards and upside down, though. More accurate to say that the precise order it was done in was the first time it was done, for us. We are not "right" for the universe, nor it for us; rather we are the universe that is right. It can't not be right, for us. Quote:
Only if you hold up the finished result as the goal of the development; but it wasn't.
__________________
It's less of a world take over and more of a world make over. - Dr. Phineas Waldolf Steel Brad Chat |