![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
If all the books of the bible except one were to be destroyed in all forms. Which one would you say was the one we would need to keep?
I was told that Romans is a great overview of the bible. Some-one else told me acts because of it's church tradition. Which do you say?
__________________
The only reason why conscious intentions fail is because they are sabotaged by subconscious counter intentions. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I've always been partial to the book of Matthew. I think it important for a religon which is supposed to emulate a specific person to have a record of that persons life. How did he get here? What message did he preach? What directions did he leave for us? If only one book survived I definately think it should be one of the Gospels.
__________________
Lets agree to respect each others veiws, no matter how wrong your's may be. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have a penchant for ecclesiastes.............
Strangely enough, I found this 'view' on the book:- http://www.biblequestions.org/Archives/BQAR333.htmSome basic facts about the Book of Ecclesiastes. Ecclesiastes is spiritually, morally, and intellectually challenging and rewarding. The writer not only wrote by inspiration, but also had himself experienced what he taught. The author, apparently Solomon, had sought fulfillment in secular knowledge, physical pleasure, architecture, agriculture, and materialism (Eccl. 1: 16-18; 2: 1-3; 2: 4; 2: 4-6; 2: 7-10). His quests had been extraordinary but still not the answer to true success (Eccl. 1: 16, 2: 7, 9, 10). He said such is "vanity and vexation of spirit" (Eccl. 1: 14, 2: 11). Some have thought the book is pessimistic, however, we must understand that he writes about the comparative futility of the secular (without God). Some even view the author as a materialist, no life after this life (cp. Eccl. 9: 10). Again, we must realize that he wrote about matters pertaining to this life (see "under the sun," Eccl. 9: 5, 6). This book of wisdom teaches life after this life, be assured (Eccl. 12: 7).
__________________
My life is an open book; if you don't like the read, put me back on the shelf ....................
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
The Gospel of John
__________________
"Scully, one of these days, we're going to look back on this moment and laugh." - Fox |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
James
__________________
Doamne Iisuse Hristoase, Fiul lui Dumnezeu, miluieşte-mă pe mine, păcătosul. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I also like john. It so much more expressive.
__________________
The only reason why conscious intentions fail is because they are sabotaged by subconscious counter intentions. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Every time I try to talk to someone, it's "I'm sorry this" and "forgive me that," and "I'm not worthy." It's like those miserable psalms...they're so depressing -- God |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
You know I was waiting for some philisophical comment to come out. I was pleasanly surprised to see that it didn't.... until now.
Timewarp - One word answer. "Duhh" I am talking about the bibles books not a relationship with God. To be cleat I don't dissagree with what you said, in fact I definitely agree. But thats for a different thread.
__________________
The only reason why conscious intentions fail is because they are sabotaged by subconscious counter intentions. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
~*It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine*~
|