![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi all
![]() I'm a bit curious here. How do you decide how much of Jesus' teachings to follow? It's just that i've read that some of you believe that he did walk the earth - therefore i assume you see the Biblical accounts as being accurate, otherwise you would have no reason to believe the truthfulness of him having walked the earth. Anyway, just curious as to how you make the distinction between what you accept and the stuff he taught that you reject. Thanks! ![]() |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() second, just to quickly note that i can talk only for my own beliefs, and not for the other christian wiccans on the forum. to best answer your question, i would like to highlight this part of yoru post: Quote:
bits of the bible i can personally agree with, from a moral point of view, but i see the whole bible as a guide, not a rule book. i do not believe their are universal objective truths, i do not believe there is one set of moral rules that everyone in every culture in every period of time should live by - morality is subjective. This belief of mine could be seen as conradictory to the bible, becasue you could argue the bible lays out how we should live our lives, and that by living in this way, we can go to heaven, and by ignoring these rules, we risk going to some form of hell. im not sure if that was relevant, or a tangent ........ i will post some more on this tomorrow when i can think straight ![]() if you think of any more questions, or if you want my point of view on any particular bits of scripture, please, feel free to ask - you cna either ask in the forums, or send me a PM for now, blessed be ![]()
__________________
Mike182 is feeling a lot better since he got that off his chest. Gay Icons! Ban Homosexuality! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well said, Mike. If I might add, in my perspective, Christ's 2 laws, love God, love everyone else is the key for me. As mike said, so much of the bible has been changed, edited, translated, re-edited and so forth. So by trying to love everyone, it's hard to go wrong with the rest of your beliefs.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for the responses
Can i just ask how sure you are that most of the gospel accounts of the teaching of Jesus have been altered and changed to warrent you having to follow the more general point of the teachings of Jesus? I have been under the impression that secular scholars in the field have testified to the reliability of the gospels stating that we have recovered with 99% accuracy the NT text. In all the variants of the NT 95% of the errors causing the differences are recognised as unintentional - ie. confusion of similar letters, repetition of words and sentances etc. The remaining 5% include revised spelling, harmonization of passages, elimination of textual difficulties and theological and doctrinal changes. These are easy to spot since there are so many maniscripts available to study of the NT (over 24,000). However everyone is in agreement that the theological teachings and doctrines are preserved unchanged since the NT was penned. So i was just wondering where you are getting your information from? What i have posted up is the view of scholars in this field of work. Thanks |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |