![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"...I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between Church and State ... " - Thomas Jefferson, US President, 1802 Namaste, Engyo |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Esse quam videri. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm doing a Buddhist foundation course (Gelug Buddhism); I'm 10 months into a two-year course, so know a little about rebirth, karma, and the aggregates; but karma and the aggregates, as far as I know, do not prove rebirth.
And karma is such a vast subject, it is said (so I've been taught) that only Buddha's understand it's full implications. However, I'm starting to move towards a classical belief of rebirth, more from the understanding of what the mind actually is, through study and meditation; and also because I think a belief in rebirth would be better for my practise. But really, the bottom line could be faith - not blind faith - but faith built upon the fact that the Buddha was right about 'this', so maybe he was right about 'that'. Jus' my thoughts. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think it's not that they prove rebirth, but that rebirth doesnt make as much sense without karma. Likewise the idea of the five aggregates makes the conventional reincarnation make less sense because if the "self" we perceive refers to the five aggregates, then there being no abiding self to be reincarnated makes rebirth make more sense.
__________________
Esse quam videri. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Friend of Bill W,
Let's say that a car is the five aggregates put together. Body, motor, wheels, panels, and electrics. Which one of these aggregates, actually makes the car? The body by itself? The motor by itself? etc. Put them all together though and there is your car. Same with us. Which one of the aggregates actually makes us? The idea of practice is not to believe what the Buddha say's, it's to use the tools (Dharma) and work it out yourself. And if you don't get it this life, maybe you will in the next.
__________________
David It's like a finger pointing at the moon...... Look at the moon stupid ![]() First there is a mountain then there is no mountain, then there is Donovan |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
But what I was interested in was this quote: Quote:
So karma is easy to believe in. But rebirth isn't so easy. So I wondered how if you can't believe in rebirth, then that also means you can't believe in karma. I wanted to know why, and the question was answered. Thanks all. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
MY interpretation is that Buddhism is not concerned with reincarnation, since it means the reincarnation of an abiding entity. My current, faulty and incomplete interpretation of rebirth is that it is going on always, moment by moment. The Buddha taught rebirth and whilst it may seem that the difference is simply semantic it actually is not. The Buddhadharma does not teach reincarnation but it is a view which can be found in other Dharma traditions.
Last edited by Magog; 10-08-2011 at 06:51 AM.. |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
How about a Heaven in a Christian version as such, would that be less plausible than reincarnation?
__________________
"Creationism, because its easier to read one book than a bunch of hard ones" Source unknown |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
It depends. How literal do you want to be? The more literal that heaven, the more need for some sort of supernatural entity there will be.
__________________
Wikipedia junkie, Brazilian atheist / buddhist http://luisdantas.zip.net; see Itinerant Lurker's handy guide to forum quoting syntax |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Both seem implausible to me. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |