![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ha ha Luis.
![]() We know each other too well. Don't we? ![]()
__________________
That which is not uttered by speech, that by which the word is expressed, know That alone to be Brahman, and not this which is being worshipped. ... |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Know who?
![]()
__________________
Wikipedia junkie, Brazilian atheist / buddhist http://luisdantas.zip.net; see Itinerant Lurker's handy guide to forum quoting syntax |
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ya. That is a fine question. The finest in fact. So, who is asking 'know who?'?
![]() (Hey. I am sorry. This DIR and actually I agree with you). Thanks.
__________________
That which is not uttered by speech, that by which the word is expressed, know That alone to be Brahman, and not this which is being worshipped. ... Last edited by atanu; 09-30-2011 at 04:14 AM.. |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
A sense of self is asking "who".
__________________
Wikipedia junkie, Brazilian atheist / buddhist http://luisdantas.zip.net; see Itinerant Lurker's handy guide to forum quoting syntax |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sense is all that is true of objects of this universe. So, my point is that upholding the objects as more real than the seer/knower of the sense objects is nonsense, IMO.
__________________
That which is not uttered by speech, that by which the word is expressed, know That alone to be Brahman, and not this which is being worshipped. ... |
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
I guess we can only agree to disagree then, because I simply don't see the nonsense in that. In fact, I hold just the opposite view; sense is accidental in nature, and things lack a true essence.
__________________
Wikipedia junkie, Brazilian atheist / buddhist http://luisdantas.zip.net; see Itinerant Lurker's handy guide to forum quoting syntax |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
How is this not atheistic naturalism? When you die, you're dead and everything goes black.
|
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
What is the point of Nirvana?
__________________
That which is not uttered by speech, that by which the word is expressed, know That alone to be Brahman, and not this which is being worshipped. ... |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Making Buddhism not Naturalism, perhaps
![]() And that is probably the correct answer, too. Naturalism, to the best of my knowledge, lacks an explicit moral directive.
__________________
Wikipedia junkie, Brazilian atheist / buddhist http://luisdantas.zip.net; see Itinerant Lurker's handy guide to forum quoting syntax |
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I baulk when Buddhists appear to be nothing but naturalists.
__________________
That which is not uttered by speech, that by which the word is expressed, know That alone to be Brahman, and not this which is being worshipped. ... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |