LDS beliefs and the Bible

[silvermoon383]

So uss_bigd, would it be a fair assumption that you don't do anything that isn't in the Bible?

[madhatter85]

Fish hunter

Fish-Hunter and Madhatter85 - LDS, the Bible, and the Word of God

1 on 1 you and me

[Sola'lor]

Originally Posted by madhatter85

Fish hunter

Fish-Hunter and Madhatter85 - LDS, the Bible, and the Word of God

1 on 1 you and me

*crowd gasps*

[Orontes]

Originally Posted by madhatter85

Fish hunter

Fish-Hunter and Madhatter85 - LDS, the Bible, and the Word of God

1 on 1 you and me

Hello,

I have basically focused on Fish-Hunter's posts in this thread. I have been critical of a general sloppiness and failure to give any type of wherefore for many of his charges: example, and example. I have also noted a fundamental category mistake in his stance that undercuts the whole tenor of his postion: post. Even so, I noted this statement at the head of your challenge: "Due to the extremely annoying level of anti-mormonism eminating from the lips of Fish-Hunter i will challenge him to a 1 on 1 about how the LDS view the Bible so he will shut up." Fish-Hunter believes his view is the correct one and Mormonism is flawed. He is also passionate about his views. I think that is fine, a free exchange of ideas is a good thing. For what it's worth, I don't think Fish-Hunter intends to be annoying, nor does he strike me as any kind of bigot or a nasty fellow.

[madhatter85]

Originally Posted by Orontes

Hello,

I have basically focused on Fish-Hunter's posts in this thread. I have been critical of a general sloppiness and failure to give any type of wherefore for many of his charges: example, and example. I have also noted a fundamental category mistake in his stance that undercuts the whole tenor of his postion: post. Even so, I noted this statement at the head of your challenge: "Due to the extremely annoying level of anti-mormonism eminating from the lips of Fish-Hunter i will challenge him to a 1 on 1 about how the LDS view the Bible so he will shut up." Fish-Hunter believes his view is the correct one and Mormonism is flawed. He is also passionate about his views. I think that is fine, a free exchange of ideas is a good thing. For what it's worth, I don't think Fish-Hunter intends to be annoying, nor does he strike me as any kind of bigot or a nasty fellow.

It's called passive agressiveness, it's a tactic used by people who do intend on being annoying but don't want to seem like it on the surface.

the way he words his statements are definitely passive aggressive. he does nto wish to know more but rather to "prove us wrong" and ignore the questions he can't answer.

[DeepShadow]

Originally Posted by Orontes

I have also noted a fundamental category mistake in his stance that undercuts the whole tenor of his postion: post.

Wait...are you referring to fundamental attribution error?

[DeepShadow]

Originally Posted by madhatter85

the way he words his statements are definitely passive aggressive. he does nto wish to know more but rather to "prove us wrong" and ignore the questions he can't answer.

I think that's only one of many possibilities. I think fundamental attribution error may be another valid one.

[DeepShadow]

Oh sorry, Orontes was talking about fundamental debating parameters. Darn my psychology training getting me mixed up in this!

[uss_bigd]

Originally Posted by silvermoon383

So uss_bigd, would it be a fair assumption that you don't do anything that isn't in the Bible?

That is fair ... why do you ask?