![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Why do so many people think that their religion has some sort of monopoly/ownership/preference over the GENERIC term 'god'? Furthermore, unless you have a verse that includes the use of his titles, references, and any generic term that is used for him, then I fail to see how you can make such an assertion without indicating that it is merely your assumption from what is actually stated in the Bible. Is using the generic term 'deity' also using his name in vain? What about the terms "his," "him," "he..." Where is the line to be drawn and why draw it there?
__________________
. Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job. ~Douglas Adams Last edited by Mestemia; 12-04-2007 at 12:37 PM. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
You would still have to use the Kings NAME. Not merely his title, a reference word, or the generic term 'King'.
__________________
. Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job. ~Douglas Adams |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
God gave thease commands to the jews not the christians. The command thou shal not take the name of God in vain was to the jews.
Althogh I would not recommend to do it anyways
__________________
MADANECH MUSAIED MALA HABIBAL |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"It's true that we don't know what we've got until we lose it, but it's also true that we don't know what we've been missing until it arrives." Unknown |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
In my analogy the kings name on the cheque does not represent God's name but His authority, just as God has given Christians authority to act in His Name (authority) but not according to our own lusts but for His glory and the edification of the saints.
__________________
1st Chronicles 17:20 O LORD, there is none like thee, neither is there any God beside thee, according to all that we have heard with our ears![]() |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I don't think it would be in vain to inform us non-believers so that we can avoid it in order not to sin against the commandment, so since you indirectly claim that you know the Name (i.e. how else could you claim that it actually is used?), could you please post it for us?
__________________
Those are my principles, and if you don´t like them... well, I have others. - Groucho Marx |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"It's true that we don't know what we've got until we lose it, but it's also true that we don't know what we've been missing until it arrives." Unknown |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The OT says nothing about titles. The OT says NAME.
__________________
. Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job. ~Douglas Adams |
|
#20
|
||||
|