Religious Education Forum  

Welcome to Religious Forums
Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page!

Home Who's Online Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Religious Education Forum / Religious Topics / Religious Debates / Scriptural Debates / Biblical Debates
Sitemap Popular RF Forums REGISTER Search Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-04-2007, 12:31 PM
Mestemia's Avatar
Mestemia Offline
Religion: Girls on Trampolines
Title:Advocatus Diaboli
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Michiana
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,849
Frubals: 1940901
Mestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal Whore
Mestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal Whore
Mestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal Whore
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotty View Post
Using God's title "God" also qualifies as taking His name in vain. The point is irreverently referring to the Lord, by any of his "names" or titles.
'God' is now Jehovah's/YHWH/Yahweh's title?
Why do so many people think that their religion has some sort of monopoly/ownership/preference over the GENERIC term 'god'?

Furthermore, unless you have a verse that includes the use of his titles, references, and any generic term that is used for him, then I fail to see how you can make such an assertion without indicating that it is merely your assumption from what is actually stated in the Bible.

Is using the generic term 'deity' also using his name in vain?
What about the terms "his," "him," "he..."
Where is the line to be drawn and why draw it there?
__________________
.




Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.
~Douglas Adams


Last edited by Mestemia; 12-04-2007 at 12:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-04-2007, 12:35 PM
Mestemia's Avatar
Mestemia Offline
Religion: Girls on Trampolines
Title:Advocatus Diaboli
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Michiana
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,849
Frubals: 1940901
Mestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal Whore
Mestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal Whore
Mestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal Whore
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by *Paul* View Post
like if a KIng gave you a blank cheque book with His signature to spend for the benefit of His kingdom but instead you spend it for your own benefit that would be a misuse of the name of the king,
Bad analogy.
You would still have to use the Kings NAME.
Not merely his title, a reference word, or the generic term 'King'.
__________________
.




Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.
~Douglas Adams

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-04-2007, 12:40 PM
Aure's Avatar
Aure Offline
Religion: everything
Title:MUSHA
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Gender: Male
Posts: 21
Frubals: 3653
Aure is a jewel in the roughAure is a jewel in the roughAure is a jewel in the roughAure is a jewel in the roughAure is a jewel in the roughAure is a jewel in the roughAure is a jewel in the roughAure is a jewel in the roughAure is a jewel in the roughAure is a jewel in the roughAure is a jewel in the roughAure is a jewel in the rough
Default The commands

God gave thease commands to the jews not the christians. The command thou shal not take the name of God in vain was to the jews.
Althogh I would not recommend to do it anyways
__________________
MADANECH MUSAIED MALA HABIBAL
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-04-2007, 12:42 PM
Scott C.'s Avatar
Scott C. Offline
Religion: Latter-day Saint
Title:Beach Bum
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 788
Frubals: 169262
Scott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond repute
Scott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mestemia View Post
'God' is now Johovahs title?
Why do so many people think that their religion has some sort of monopoly/ownership/preference over the GENERIC term 'god'?

Furthermore, unless you have a verse that includes the use of his titles, references, and any generic term that is used for him, then I fail to see how you can make such an assertion without indicating that it is merely your assumption from what is actually stated in the Bible.
I understand the word "god" can refer to many things. If a Christian uses the term "God" as an expletive, that Christian is clearly referring to the God in whom he believes. I don't think there are many Christians who would say it's okay to invoke the term "God" as an expletive, but it's not ok to invoke the name Jehovah or Jesus Christ as an expletive, on the basis that one word is a noun and the other a specific name.
__________________
"It's true that we don't know what we've got until we lose it, but it's also true that we don't know what we've been missing until it arrives." Unknown
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-04-2007, 12:44 PM
*Paul*'s Avatar
*Paul* Offline
Title:I love Jesus Christ
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: England
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,185
Frubals: 119436
*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute
*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute*Paul* has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mestemia View Post
Bad analogy.
You would still have to use the Kings NAME.
Not merely his title, a reference word, or the generic term 'King'.
In my analogy the kings name on the cheque does not represent God's name but His authority, just as God has given Christians authority to act in His Name (authority) but not according to our own lusts but for His glory and the edification of the saints.
__________________
1st Chronicles 17:20 O LORD, there is none like thee, neither is there any God beside thee, according to all that we have heard with our ears
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-04-2007, 12:56 PM
anders Offline
Title:Senior Member
Scholarship Award:  - Issue reason:  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sweden
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,673
Frubals: 29893
anders has much to be proud of
anders has much to be proud ofanders has much to be proud ofanders has much to be proud ofanders has much to be proud ofanders has much to be proud ofanders has much to be proud ofanders has much to be proud ofanders has much to be proud ofanders has much to be proud ofanders has much to be proud ofanders has much to be proud ofanders has much to be proud ofanders has much to be proud ofanders has much to be proud ofanders has much to be proud ofanders has much to be proud ofanders has much to be proud ofanders has much to be proud ofanders has much to be proud ofanders has much to be proud ofanders has much to be proud ofanders has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotty View Post
Why do many Christians take the name of God in vain? Do you agree they do? Is this an indicator of the relationship one feels with God in his/her heart? Is it a big deal? How do you define taking the name of God in vain? Is this emphasized in your Christian services?
When I was in the Lutheran Evangelical Church of Sweden, that was no problem. Nobody knew any name, so we freely used titles and references like God, Lord, our Father etc.

I don't think it would be in vain to inform us non-believers so that we can avoid it in order not to sin against the commandment, so since you indirectly claim that you know the Name (i.e. how else could you claim that it actually is used?), could you please post it for us?
__________________
Those are my principles, and if you don´t like them... well, I have others. - Groucho Marx
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-04-2007, 12:59 PM
MidnightBlue's Avatar
MidnightBlue Offline
Religion: Bad Buddhist Friend
Title:Atheist Queer
Scholarship Award:  - Issue reason:  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Elsewhere
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,522
Frubals: 3146853
MidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal Whore
MidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal Whore
MidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal WhoreMidnightBlue is a Frubal Whore
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Katzpur View Post
I don't know, but it drives me up a wall to hear people say, "Jesus Christ!" when they're mad at somebody. To me, that's what taking God's name in vain is. His name is to be spoken with reverence and respect, not as a way of expressing your anger.
I grew up with a grandfather who said "Jesus Christ" in just this way, and I sometimes do it myself, though most of the time I try to watch myself around Christians. My grandmother always said "Ye gods!" -- on the theory, I suppose that it's okay if you're not referring to the Christian god.
__________________


Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-06-2007, 03:09 PM
Scott C.'s Avatar
Scott C. Offline
Religion: Latter-day Saint
Title:Beach Bum
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 788
Frubals: 169262
Scott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond repute
Scott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond reputeScott C. has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by anders View Post
When I was in the Lutheran Evangelical Church of Sweden, that was no problem. Nobody knew any name, so we freely used titles and references like God, Lord, our Father etc.

I don't think it would be in vain to inform us non-believers so that we can avoid it in order not to sin against the commandment, so since you indirectly claim that you know the Name (i.e. how else could you claim that it actually is used?), could you please post it for us?
I'm not referring to a particular "name". I'm referring to any word that refers to the God I believe in, being the God of the Old and New Testaments. The words could be God, Jesus, Lord, Jehovah, Savior, Heavenly Father, Redeemer, Christ, etc. I believe all of those terms are sacred and should be spoken with care and respect. I believe when we use one of those types of words carelessly, especially as an expletive, we are "taking the name of God in vain", as defined by the Old Testament.
__________________
"It's true that we don't know what we've got until we lose it, but it's also true that we don't know what we've been missing until it arrives." Unknown
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-06-2007, 04:05 PM
Mestemia's Avatar
Mestemia Offline
Religion: Girls on Trampolines
Title:Advocatus Diaboli
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Michiana
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,849
Frubals: 1940901
Mestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal Whore
Mestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal Whore
Mestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal WhoreMestemia is a Frubal Whore
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotty View Post
I'm not referring to a particular "name". I'm referring to any word that refers to the God I believe in, being the God of the Old and New Testaments. The words could be God, Jesus, Lord, Jehovah, Savior, Heavenly Father, Redeemer, Christ, etc. I believe all of those terms are sacred and should be spoken with care and respect. I believe when we use one of those types of words carelessly, especially as an expletive, we are "taking the name of God in vain", as defined by the Old Testament.
But that is NOT how the old testament defines it.
The OT says nothing about titles.
The OT says NAME.
__________________
.




Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.
~Douglas Adams

Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-06-2007, 04:38 PM
Captain Civic's Avatar
Captain Civic Offline
Religion: Christian
Title:version 2.0
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 402
Frubals: 65786
Captain Civic has a brilliant futureCaptain Civic has a brilliant futureCaptain Civic has a brilliant future
Captain Civic has a brilliant futureCaptain Civic has a brilliant futureCaptain Civic has a brilliant futureCaptain Civic has a brilliant future