Do you think the bible god makes mistakes? (priest, hell)

[Bishka]

Originally Posted by dawny0826

Yeah...I'm one of those people.

Me too

[ProfLogic]

Originally Posted by LoveroftheBeloved

I have nothing to lose here.

By the way don't forget that the government has been tracking you if you are using a computer after the 486 motherboards... lol. I think its called the V chip.

[ProfLogic]

Originally Posted by beckysoup61

Me too

Hey doesn't the giraffe get tired of falling down on your Avitar?

[Bishka]

Originally Posted by ProfLogic

Hey doesn't the giraffe get tired of falling down on your Avitar?

What does this have to do with the current topic of the 'bible god' making mistakes?

[ProfLogic]

Originally Posted by LoveroftheBeloved

On this point we are agreed. ProfLogic, please quote the Bible with references to the verses so that your points will hold water.

OK I will, its just so hard to break in the vault of the original scriptures which can not be viewed at all by ordinary citizens and currently scholars are being denied access too. I will try to do my best....

[SoyLeche]

Originally Posted by beckysoup61

What does this have to do with the current topic of the 'bible god' making mistakes?

If God existed, it would never allow a giraffe avatar to continually fall down. Therefore, God can't exist.

Wow, that was fun. I see why PL likes to make these up.

[Bishka]

Originally Posted by ProfLogic

OK I will, its just so hard to break in the vault of the original scriptures which can not be viewed at all by ordinary citizens and currently scholars are being denied access too. I will try to do my best....

You really believe in all the conspiracy theory junk, don't ya?

[mr.guy]

Originally Posted by ProfLogic

OK I will, its just so hard to break in the vault of the original scriptures which can not be viewed at all by ordinary citizens and currently scholars are being denied access too. I will try to do my best....

You're really making a prophet of me.

From YOUR "why the bible are man't thoughts", post #54

ME: The vast majority of your posts can be divided into two categories:
a)Immature, irrelevant and unfounded attacks on all posters whom you can determine as "believers"
b)Poor excuses as to why you don't have to validate any of your statements; usually in the form of incoherent statements (as above) or restatements of your own testimonials as fact.

You're now drawing from column "b". I've yet to see you expand on your pitifull arsenal; a reasonable person might abandon such fruitless and useless tactics when confronted so frequently with such obvious failure to express and convince.

[ProfLogic]

Originally Posted by mr.guy

You're really making a prophet of me.

From YOUR "why the bible are man't thoughts", post #54

ME: The vast majority of your posts can be divided into two categories:
a)Immature, irrelevant and unfounded attacks on all posters whom you can determine as "believers"
b)Poor excuses as to why you don't have to validate any of your statements; usually in the form of incoherent statements (as above) or restatements of your own testimonials as fact.

You're now drawing from column "b". I've yet to see you expand on your pitifull arsenal; a reasonable person might abandon such fruitless and useless tactics when confronted so frequently with such obvious failure to express and convince.

So yours is A?

[ProfLogic]

Originally Posted by mr.guy

You're really making a prophet of me.

From YOUR "why the bible are man't thoughts", post #54

ME: The vast majority of your posts can be divided into two categories:
a)Immature, irrelevant and unfounded attacks on all posters whom you can determine as "believers"
b)Poor excuses as to why you don't have to validate any of your statements; usually in the form of incoherent statements (as above) or restatements of your own testimonials as fact.

You're now drawing from column "b". I've yet to see you expand on your pitifull arsenal; a reasonable person might abandon such fruitless and useless tactics when confronted so frequently with such obvious failure to express and convince.

As if you have access to the original text. The point is when you read the bible that is the impression that might give to the reader, is that so hard to understand. It si translated by a man, is that hard to understand. The original scriptures was written and no one seems to understand the language. As I said talk to a priest and ask about the fires of hell. The main argument is that ice was not abundant during those times so fire was used in reference? If the author knew that cold/ice can induce the same pain as fire then it would have been used, the point is they did not know. Is it because you are a person who rather criticize than actually show their opinion on a designated subject?