The Perpetual Virginity of Mary (Jesus, crucifixion, blood, disciple)

[ChrisBianchi]

The Catholic Church teaches that Mary remained a virgin for her entire lifetime. Where is the scriptural evidence?

I have done some web searching and have found many arguments in favor of Mary's perpetual virginity none of which provide any scriptural evidence to support them. The following appear to be some key passages that arguers in favor use as argument:

Originally Posted by John 19:26-27 NIV

When Jesus saw his mother there, and the disciple whom he loved standing nearby, he said to his mother, "Dear woman, here is your son," and to the disciple, "Here is your mother." From that time on, this disciple took her into his home.

This passage appears during the crucifixion. Jesus is telling Mary to love the disciple as a son. He is telling the disciple to love Mary as a mother. The final sentence is open to interpretation. Either Mary went to live with the disciple or she was thereafter welcome at the disciple's home. Since the verse is ambiguous, it is neither proof nor evidence of the possibility that Jesus had siblings. Neither is the existence of siblings indicitive of Mary's sexual relationship with Joseph. Either could have encountered sterility or no pregnancy due to pure happenstance.

Originally Posted by Luke 1:35 NIV

The angel answered, "The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. So the holy one to be born will be called the Son of God.

Some claim that this verse expresses a marriage between Mary and God. Therefore, a sexual relationship with Joseph would have been adulterous. However, if Mary maintained a marriage to God, then even marrying Joseph would have been adulterous. An angel later told Joseph to take Mary as his wife. Paul later preached that a woman and man should give of their bodies freely to one another in marriage.

Originally Posted by Luke 1:34

"How will this be," Mary asked the angel, "since I am a virgin?"

Some claim that this verse indicates that Mary never intended to have a sexual relationship with Joseph. But, the verse gives us no indication of Mary's future intentions. Mary was engaged to Joseph prior to the pregnancy, and we have no indication of what her intentions were. One would assume that her intentions were the same as any other woman that would be getting married during her time period - establish herself with a working man and raise a family. Mary is merely asking the angel how she could possibly be pregnant since she hadn't been with a man.

None of the above passages give any indication of Mary's sexual relationship with Joseph after the birth of Jesus. Therefore, what scriptural evidence is there that tells us of Mary's perpetual virginity?

[jeffrey]

I voted yes, but it really doesn't matter. Weather her other children were hers or her step children would not change the way I see her. She was the mother of Christ. That's what's important.

[MidnightBlue]

I always find it a little amusing when people think it's unlikely that Mary was sexually abstinent after the birth of Jesus, but have no trouble believing she was a virgin until his birth. Which is more plausible?

[ChrisBianchi]

Originally Posted by jeffrey

I voted yes, but it really doesn't matter. Weather her other children were hers or her step children would not change the way I see her. She was the mother of Christ. That's what's important.

I do agree with you, however I am not questioning whether or not she had other children. It would have been quite possible for her to have a sexual relationship without further pregnancy. I don't want this to start into a discussion of James or other possible siblings of Jesus. Specifically, I would like someone who does believe in the perpetual virginity of Mary to show scriptural evidence to support that belief.

[Halcyon]

James was the brother of Jesus, so i very much doubt it.

[ChrisBianchi]

Originally Posted by Halcyon

James was the brother of Jesus, so i very much doubt it.

Again, I don't want this to turn into a siblings case because, quite frankly, the scriptures do not say that James was the son of Mary. Jesus called many people brothers and sisters. The use of the term did not necessarily define a blood relationship.

[jeffrey]

Joseph was up in his years when he married Mary. He is thought to have died when Jesus was about 14. Joseph had children from a previous marriage. And like I said, whether or not they had relations would not change who she is.

[Aqualung]

I said no, just because it's very highly unlikely that she was a virgin for that long, and it really doens't make her any less to think that (Gasp! ) she had sex.

[Halcyon]

Originally Posted by ChrisBianchi

Again, I don't want this to turn into a siblings case because, quite frankly, the scriptures do not say that James was the son of Mary. Jesus called many people brothers and sisters. The use of the term did not necessarily define a blood relationship.

There are non-canonical scriptures which say James was his brother, but if you don't want to talk about siblings then that's the last i'll say on it.

The virgin birth idea stemmed from a mistranslation of an old testament prophecy where they translated young woman as virgin. Since the whole virgin birth idea is thus probably untrue, i find it likely Mary was not a virgin her whole life.

[jeffrey]

It's one thing we will never know.... until we die, get to heaven, then you can ask her!