![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Genesis 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God
created he him; male and female created he them. Genesis 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. If Adam and Eve were the first people on the Earth, created by God, why would he command them to replenish the earth? The word replenish means to fill up again or to restore to a former level or condition. So the word itself would denote that there were people before Adam and Eve, otherwise it wouldn’t be necessary to refill but to simply fill. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
God's first command to man was that of producing abundant progeny sufficient to fill the earth (not replenish, a misleading translation of the Hebrew word male). Perhaps the animals had been created in large numbers of each kind, but the human population began with only two people. The function of subduing the earth and having dominion over it would necessarily require a long time--first, for the growth of a large enough population to fill the earth, and second, for the acquiring of enough knowledge and skill to enable man to bring it under full control and development.
__________________
My life is an open book; if you don't like the read, put me back on the shelf ....................
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I don't doubt that it was a mistranslation but that doesn't help anyone reading the Bible in English who knows nothing about the original languages. I thought that it would be a mistranslation, that seems to be the stock answer. I wasn't trying to prove or disprove anything in the Bible, it was just an observation that I made while reading Genesis again. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
My life is an open book; if you don't like the read, put me back on the shelf ....................
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't think the story is meant to be taken literally Reyjamiei.
__________________
Run children, God is coming...
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Artificial Life on your PC |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
http://freedomfriends.org/ |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
I keep telling everyone, that the Bible is filled with sooo many errors and things that do not match up, that to read it in its literal form and take in everything it passes to us, is an idiocy. Don't do it. It has been written, and rewritten, transferred from language to language, and twisted and forged to fit certain religious expectations...I mean, really, it cannot be trusted as 'right' in its entirity...
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |