![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
One can take agnosticism as Thomas Huxley himself did as a method of epistemology- going where the evidence leads, in which case ,I ,a strong atheist/ignostic also would be agnostic.
__________________
Fr. Griggs rests in his Socratic ignorance and humble naturalism. He might be wrong! His cognitive defects might impact his posting. Blessings and goodwill to all! Reason saves.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
As has been repeatedly noted. Bravo for making this necessary observation yet again.
__________________
if G-d ( G-d is not 'X' for all 'X' )
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Jay, noted.
__________________
Fr. Griggs rests in his Socratic ignorance and humble naturalism. He might be wrong! His cognitive defects might impact his posting. Blessings and goodwill to all! Reason saves.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |