Religious Education Forum  

Welcome to Religious Forums
Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page!

Home Who's Online Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Religious Education Forum / Discuss Individual Religions / Abrahamic Religions
Sitemap Popular RF Forums REGISTER Search Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-04-2005, 02:42 PM
almifkhar Offline
Title:Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Gender: Undisclosed
Posts: 980
Frubals: 18302
almifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to behold
Default oddities in the creation stories

there are somethings that i have always found a bit odd in the holy quran, torrah and in the holy bible. i will try to remember to do other threads on these oddities. on this thread i will foucs only on the creation stories in these three holy books.

holy quran
1. we have not created the heavens and the earth, and all that lies between them, out of fun.
2. man we fashioned from fermented clay dried tingling hard
3. if you have any doubt, o men, about being raised to life again remember that we created you from dust
4. we made several highways one over the other above you. we are not neglectful of creation.

holy bible
1. god said, let us make man in our image, in our likeness

now i have even read in a bible once (i don't remember which translation it was) and it stated WE CREATED THE HEAVENS AND EARTH

i do have a jewish torrah here but it i cannot read hebrew, from what i have read on this subject, ehlom (spelled wrong sorry) is plural, and that this term for god is used up to moses. perhaps our jewish brothers and sisters on this forum could clear this up for me.

my question here is what is with the WE if god is ONE why the WE?

i have also noticed in the quran and holy bible, and the english in the torrah that the referrence to we is mainly used were the creation of man is concerned where as when the universe was created it usually mentions god alone created.

what does this mean, especially when we are talking about monothestic religons?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-04-2005, 02:48 PM
jewscout's Avatar
jewscout Offline
Religion: Judaism
Title:Religious Zionist
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Israel
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,316
Frubals: 198737
jewscout has a reputation beyond reputejewscout has a reputation beyond reputejewscout has a reputation beyond reputejewscout has a reputation beyond reputejewscout has a reputation beyond reputejewscout has a reputation beyond reputejewscout has a reputation beyond reputejewscout has a reputation beyond reputejewscout has a reputation beyond repute
jewscout has a reputation beyond reputejewscout has a reputation beyond reputejewscout has a reputation beyond reputejewscout has a reputation beyond reputejewscout has a reputation beyond reputejewscout has a reputation beyond reputejewscout has a reputation beyond reputejewscout has a reputation beyond reputejewscout has a reputation beyond reputejewscout has a reputation beyond reputejewscout has a reputation beyond reputejewscout has a reputation beyond reputejewscout has a reputation beyond reputejewscout has a reputation beyond reputejewscout has a reputation beyond reputejewscout has a reputation beyond reputejewscout has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by almifkhar
there are somethings that i have always found a bit odd in the holy quran, torrah and in the holy bible. i will try to remember to do other threads on these oddities. on this thread i will foucs only on the creation stories in these three holy books.

holy quran
1. we have not created the heavens and the earth, and all that lies between them, out of fun.
2. man we fashioned from fermented clay dried tingling hard
3. if you have any doubt, o men, about being raised to life again remember that we created you from dust
4. we made several highways one over the other above you. we are not neglectful of creation.

holy bible
1. god said, let us make man in our image, in our likeness

now i have even read in a bible once (i don't remember which translation it was) and it stated WE CREATED THE HEAVENS AND EARTH

i do have a jewish torrah here but it i cannot read hebrew, from what i have read on this subject, ehlom (spelled wrong sorry) is plural, and that this term for god is used up to moses. perhaps our jewish brothers and sisters on this forum could clear this up for me.

my question here is what is with the WE if god is ONE why the WE?

i have also noticed in the quran and holy bible, and the english in the torrah that the referrence to we is mainly used were the creation of man is concerned where as when the universe was created it usually mentions god alone created.

what does this mean, especially when we are talking about monothestic religons?
interesting that you bring this up. In my Tanach from the wonderful people Artscroll.com (cheap plug!) the commentary says something to the effect of, G-d was speaking to the ministering angels, taking into account what they had to say as well. Other commentary says that it is a royal We...like "We are not amused"
my hebrews not that good either but i'm pretty sure Elohim is not plural (like l'chiam "To life" is not translated "to lives" you know?)
binyamin or Deut. could probably shed different and better lights on this than i, but it's late and i don't think we will see Binyamin on until after Shabbat.
__________________
good night, sleep tight, and don't let the bedbugs put their foot in your....
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-04-2005, 02:51 PM
Edgar Offline
Title:Freshman Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Gender: Undisclosed
Posts: 4
Frubals: 10
Edgar is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

It's refering to the trinity
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-04-2005, 02:52 PM
Terrywoodenpic's Avatar
Terrywoodenpic Offline
Religion: Anglican-heretic
Title:Oldest Heretic
Kindness Award:  - Issue reason: The kindness award has been given to you by your peers and is well deserved.  Congrats. 
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,066
Frubals: 597531
Terrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on trees
Terrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on trees
Terrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on trees
Default

Thats a good question

In England and Europe is was, and still is, normal for Kings and Queens to use the royal we.
So it was alwas we require, never I require.
I believe this was true in Rome and anchient Egypt

So if this was common practice for royalty how much more so when talking about God.

The Linguists in the forum might have a better Idea though.


Terry_____________________-
Blessed are the poor in spirit, the kingdom of heaven is theirs.

Last edited by Terrywoodenpic; 11-05-2005 at 08:31 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-04-2005, 02:54 PM
Terrywoodenpic's Avatar
Terrywoodenpic Offline
Religion: Anglican-heretic
Title:Oldest Heretic
Kindness Award:  - Issue reason: The kindness award has been given to you by your peers and is well deserved.  Congrats. 
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,066
Frubals: 597531
Terrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on trees
Terrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on trees
Terrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on trees
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Edgar
It's refering to the trinity
I doubt it. the Trinity was not established in the old testament.

Terry______________________--
Blessed are the poor in spirit, the kingdom of heaven is theirs.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-04-2005, 02:59 PM
Edgar Offline
Title:Freshman Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Gender: Undisclosed
Posts: 4
Frubals: 10
Edgar is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

what do you mean it wasn't established
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-04-2005, 03:00 PM
Edgar Offline
Title:Freshman Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Gender: Undisclosed
Posts: 4
Frubals: 10
Edgar is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

The trinity never was established, it always was
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-04-2005, 03:00 PM
almifkhar Offline
Title:Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Gender: Undisclosed
Posts: 980
Frubals: 18302
almifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to beholdalmifkhar is a splendid one to behold
Default

wow this got hit quicker than i thougt it would.
jewscout, be sure to ask them please.

edger, i am going to do one about the trinty in a little bit, so hold on to that thought.

i don't believe this has to do with the trinty though, mainly because there is no talk of anything remotely about it in any of the books where creation is concerned. the quran however does speak about angels and jinns being created before man, but not in any kind of trinty scenerio.

keep the ideas a comming.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-04-2005, 03:14 PM
Terrywoodenpic's Avatar
Terrywoodenpic Offline
Religion: Anglican-heretic
Title:Oldest Heretic
Kindness Award:  - Issue reason: The kindness award has been given to you by your peers and is well deserved.  Congrats. 
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,066
Frubals: 597531
Terrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on trees
Terrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on trees
Terrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on treesTerrywoodenpic thinks frubals grow on trees
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Edgar
The trinity never was established, it always was
Not to the writers of genesis it wasn't
The knowledge of the Trinity, and the reality of the Trinity are two different things.
As they say"hindsight is a wonderful thing".


Terry__________________
Blessed are the gentle, they shall inherit the land
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-04-2005, 03:51 PM
Jayhawker Soule's Avatar
Jayhawker Soule Offline
Religion: naturalism
Title:Supporter
Prolific Poster Award:  - Issue reason: You have acheived over 10,000 posts here at RF. Congrats! Scholarship Award:  - Issue reason:  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,339
Frubals: 3071849
Jayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal Whore
Jayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal Whore
Jayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal WhoreJayhawker Soule is a Frubal Whore
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jewscout
interesting that you bring this up. In my Tanach from the wonderful people Artscroll.com (cheap plug!) the commentary says something to the effect of, G-d was speaking to the ministering angels, taking into account what they had to say as well.
Have you ever heard the term: r-a-t-i-o-n-a-l-i-z-a-t-i-o-n?
__________________
if G-d ( G-d is not 'X' for all 'X' )
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads