You are right on the concurrence. Normally a first time offender would not go to jail for a nonviolent crime. But I think this judge will sentence him to at last 30 days. We will see.
What crime?
You don't know that. They were told they could differ on what the secondary crime was. That is not right.
Show me in the indictment what crime Trump was trying to commit by falsifying business records. It isn't in there.
Again you don't know this because they never said they...
No they did not. The prosecution said he committed one crime to cover up one of these three crimes, they di dnot say which one.
So which one was it? The prosecution can't just say pick one.
I agree.
Ok
Trump was convicted of 34 felonies that have a max sentencing of 100+ years in jail with the defendant not knowing what crime he was convicted of. Think about that.
The conspiracy was not defined in the indictment
The conspiracy was not defined in the trial
The conspiracy was not defined by...
That was some people's concern. Seems like there were various reasons the decided on the electoral college.
I don't agree with "scheme". And it is not texas but the texas GOP.
No it was a direct correlation to your comment.
The electoral college was devised to make sure each state had a say in the process. The founders dismissed popular vote because they knew it would reduce the states powers and say in our governmental system.
Where is your source for this? Or did you write all of this and make the picture? Basically two misdemeanors that have run out of statute of limitations put together to create a felony? No one has done that before, two entities with jurisdiction passed on it and they had 8 years to charge him...